image description
Renderings of a possible Starbucks building with different color schemes. The coffeeshop is proposed to be located on the site of a closed gas station near Guido's on Route 7.
image description

Starbucks Proposed on Pittsfield-Lenox Road

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city currently has three Starbucks — all of which are condensed in Berkshire Crossing. That may be about to change.

The Community Development Board on Tuesday unanimously approved a site plan from Jamasan Hotel Management for the construction of a coffee shop and drive-through at 1030 South St., next to Guido's Fresh Marketplace.

Renderings of the proposed building revealed that it is a Starbucks.

The approval came with a couple of concerns that the board wants to communicate with the City Council, which has the final vote. These are about the possibility of vehicular conflict in front of the site and stormwater discharge.

The popular coffee chain has three locations at 555 Hubbard Ave. and Berkshire Crossing. The Hubbard Avenue location has a drive-through, the second is located inside Barnes and Noble, and the third is in Market 32.

Starbucks' competition Dunkin' Donuts has double the presence in Pittsfield with six locations.

The proposed site on Route 7 spreads over two lots and the front lot used to house a gas station.  The applicants intend to build a 2,700-square-foot coffee shop that maintains the existing curb cuts for entry and exit, has a drive-through, and a waiting lane for 21 cars with a bypass lane after the order point.

The applicant proposed stormwater recharge and detention that drains through existing pipes running behind the adjacent Jiffy Lube and into a natural outlet. A traffic analysis was done to make sure it will not affect the flow of vehicles on Route 7.


"It's fairly straightforward. We think it's a great redevelopment opportunity for the site, it's appropriate for this commercial corridor," civil engineer Timothy Power said.

The board's concerns were primarily related to the curb cut — which they felt may be hazardous — and stormwater management.

"This stretch of Route 7 is quite a bit different than even when the gas station was there," member Libby Herland said.

"We didn't have a Hilton Garden Inn, Guido's probably has expanded and is doing a tremendous amount of traffic, Bousquet is revitalized, the whole area is just — there's probably a lot more traffic than there used to be and I'm really concerned about people exiting from here right next to the exit for Guido's and for the Hilton."

Herland was also concerned about an increase in water runoff because the redevelopment would make the site more impermeable. She encouraged the applicant to look at ways to retain all of the stormwater on-site.

Powers assured the board that the plan does not increase the amount of water sent to the street and said that if it is preferred, they can send a little more back to the drain line if it has the capacity to handle it.

The council will have a public hearing on the proposal on Oct. 11 at its regularly scheduled meeting.


Tags: coffeeshop,   Planning Board,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories