image description

Dalton Looks to Tighten Tobacco Products Regulations

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

DALTON, Mass. — There appears to be no pushback to the town updating its tobacco ordinance.

The Board of Health's public hearing Monday on the topic generated no participation from residents or storeowners.  

The main proposed changes include potentially capping the number of tobacco permits, not allowing official smoking bars, minimum packaging of cigar products by price, mandated retailer training, and a blunt wrap ban, and a possibility of restricting other non-tobacco-related products.

The town's current ordinance is 11 pages long and the new proposal is 18 pages

Notices were mailed to vendors and were posted in the local newspaper as well as the town's website.  The board has not voted on any local policy yet.

"I think where Dalton is with the state law being passed a couple of years ago with your local policies being really out of date, the goal was to merge the state law into an updated local Board of Health regulation," Tri-Town Health Department Director James Wilusz said.

"And in that process, there are additional local policy options that the board could entertain if they so choose to."

The Tri-Town Health Department — comprised of Lee, Lenox, and Stockbridge — has been administering a tobacco awareness program since 1994. In April, the board approved working with Tri-Town Health Department to update the town's tobacco regulations better comply with the state regulations.

Pittsfield has also been working on its ordinance with similar recommendations after Wilusz came to its Health Board in May to give an update on tobacco control, warning the panel that products can slip through the state's regulations without specific guidelines.

One of the changes further defines "blunt wrap" as any product made wholly or in part from a tobacco product, manufactured or packaged with loose and removable leaves or section of a leaf, or as a hollow tube that may be used to wrap or contain loose tobacco or other fillers.

"Roll your own" tobacco leaf packages are to be considered blunt wraps in the new regulation. It also stipulates that a rolling paper with a characterizing flavor is considered a tobacco product flavor enhancer.

Additionally, there are proposed changes to penalties for violations and a number of provisions to control the number of tobacco permits in the town.


These include allowing a certain number of permits (which has not been determined,) that a permit should not be issued within 500 feet of a public or private school, and that it should not be issued within 500 feet of a retailer with a valid permit.

These recommendations are described as being "uniquely local policy decisions that are more stringent than state law."

"I think your next step would be, probably next month, to really decide on what local policies you want because it's still set up as an option for you," Wilusz explained.

"We really haven't drilled deep into what type of permit cap, if at all, you want and other things so you'll want to think about that for the next meeting and then make a decision on that."

In December 2019, Gov. Charlie Bakers signed an Act Modernizing Tobacco Control, which imposed new restrictions on the sale of nicotine vaping, flavored vaping, and tobacco products.

A few months prior, the governor declared a public health emergency and put a temporary ban on the sale of all vape products in the state.

The act only allows the sale of non-flavored nicotine products with 35 milligrams per milliliter of nicotine or less. It also restricts the sale of non-flavored nicotine vaping products held to the same standard to licensed, adult-only retail tobacco stores and smoking bars.

Under the new legislation, people can only purchase and smoke flavored nicotine vaping products in smoking bars, of which there are about 24 in the state.

Reportedly, the COVID-19 pandemic created a lull in education and compliance checks after the policy changes and pointed to adjustments that could be made to the city's regulations to clear up the confusion between local and state law.

Joyce Brewer, Tobacco Free Community Partnership program manager for the Berkshires, did attend the hearing to sit in and offer assistance and resources if needed.

Draft Tobacco Regulations for Dalton by iBerkshires.com on Scribd


Tags: tobacco regulations,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories