Ordinances & Rules Advises Abolishment of Public Utilities Panel

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Ordinances and Rules subcommittee on Monday voted to recommend the abolishment of the Public Utilities Advisory Committee.

According to City Solicitor Stephen Pagnotta, this would mean deleting Chapter 18 1/2 of the city code that established the panel.

The committee, which is not currently listed on the city's boards and commissions roster, is intended to advise the commissioner of public utilities on all matters under its jurisdiction including sewers, water, solid waste, and resource recovery.

There is no indication of how long the committee has been dormant.

The vote was brought on by Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren's petition requesting that ordinance amendments are drafted to reflect the abolishment of the Public Utilities Advisory Committee.

It was unanimous with Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey and Ward 6 Councilor Dina Guiel Lampiasi absent.

"This relates to the water-sewer rates and other utility issues, and they don't even have a membership on that board," Warren said.

"So it seems sort of ludicrous to have a board that we don't use, we don't put memberships online, so we might as well abolish them, so I think that makes a lot of sense."

He later added that as it stands, it indicates that all matters regarding water and sewer rates and other utilities must go through the commission.

Councilor at Large Peter White said he had spoken to Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales about the petition and he had no present issues with it.

The committee also tended to a few unfinished agenda items that were tabled in the fall. 



Ward 7 Councilor Anthony Maffuccio submitted three petitions based on recommendations outlined in the city's 2018 Efficiency Study: to implement a dispatch fee in emergency medical services provider contracts, to follow code enforcement and improve rental housing safety, and to increase and enforce false alarm fees within the Police and Fire Departments.

He explained the petitions as efforts to raise revenue.

White asked Maffuccio if he had consulted with the administration about the petitions based on the 4-year-old study and he said he had not.

In a 2-1 vote with Warren opposing, the committee passed Maffuccio's petition to recommend the implementation of a dispatch fee in EMS provider contracts.

After conversations with Building Commissioner Jeffrey Clemons and Director of Public Health Andy Cambi, the petition on code enforcement and rental housing safety was referred to the city solicitor.

The petition on false alarm fees was tabled.  

Fire Chief Thomas Sammons explained that only about one percent of the calls made to the Fire Department are false alarms. There was no metric for the Police Department.

"We don't charge for false alarms at this time and it's this is actually a little misleading, it says 11 percent of our calls are false alarm calls," he said about the study.

"If somebody burns toast or popcorn and we respond, everything worked properly so it's not a false alarm, so what's a false alarm would be where it's a malicious activation or something like that or is the same issue time and time again that draws us out. So it's actually, for the Fire Department anyway it's actually much lower than, much much lower than 11 percent."


Tags: ordinance & rules ,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Board to Mull School Committee Pay Increase

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Should the School Committee be paid more? This conversation will pick up soon.

On Tuesday, the City Council unanimously voted to send a request from Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren and Ward 4 Councilor James Conant to the Personnel Review Board.

In February, the Ordinance & Rules subcommittee recommended not to approve the request and referred it to the Charter Review Committee, which determined it should be addressed through an ordinance.

"The School Committee had never been paid until 2015. This is now 10 years later. We're having a charter review as a result of a petition of mine. Their pay needs to be adjusted before July of this year, or it can't be done for another two years. It's the right thing to do," Warren said after motioning to refer to the review board.

"Even if we double it, the School Committee pay, for six of them, it will only be $25,000."

He said the city would get what it pays for and cited the committee's hard work over the past year, which involved a difficult budget and allegations against Pittsfield Public Schools staff.

"There's a lot that's on their plate," he said. "Frankly, they do probably as much, sometimes maybe even more than we do, and they don't even get half of what we do."

School Committee members are paid $4,000 annually, city councilors $8,000, and the council president makes $10,000. The council's last raise occurred in 1994.

Warren said the last election barely saw six School Committee candidates, and he would be surprised to see six people run this year. He explained that a pay change has to be done by ordinance and pointed out that when the Personnel Review Board handled the mayor's increase, it researched other Massachusetts communities to come up with a fair pay.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories