Mount Greylock Committee Defends Handling of Pandemic

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Several members of the Mount Greylock Regional School Committee last week defended the district's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic against criticism from one of their colleagues.
 
Following an announcement by Superintendent Jason McCandless that the district would stop requiring face coverings indoors as of March 14, Steven Miller again raised his concern about the way the district has been making decisions during the pandemic.
 
"I do not believe we are making decisions based on sound science at numerous junctions, and I think some of our policies in the past have been designed more to make us feel like things are being done than to actually be effective in doing things," Miller said.
 
"We knew Massachusetts was going to remove the mask mandate by Feb. 15, we had prepared policies by MASC, and yet New York City beat us by a week in removing the mask mandates."
 
Curtis Elfenbein replied that Manhattan, where 88 percent of the population 5 and older is fully vaccinated against the novel coronavirus, is in a different situation than Berkshire County, where 60 percent of the population is fully vaccinated, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. As a result, he was OK not following New York City's timeline.
 
"There is a new survey that just came out from the American Association of Pediatricians covering 61 school districts with 1.1 million students and over 150,000 staff," Elfenbein said. "They tracked through contact tracing schools that had optional mask policies versus schools that had mask mandates. And schools with mask mandates had an 86 percent reduction in secondary infections as tracked through contact tracing compared to schools with the optional masking."
 
Jose Constantine agreed with Elfenbein and indicated that a certain amount of Monday morning quarterbacking is inevitable.
 
"I suspect that in the years to come there will be dissertations upon dissertations about the efficacy of the various mechanisms we employed," Constantine said. "I think in real time, when we are dealing with so much uncertainty with regard to the pandemic, and our main aim is to keep as many of us as well as we can possibly be and to stay alive … There are kids in our school district who are preschool age for whom now a vaccine is not available to them. There are a number of different living situations in our community where exposure to this virus could be incredibly life-threatening."
 
Ursula Maloy could be seen giving the thumbs up signal in the video conference as Constantine spoke.
 
Miller throughout the pandemic has advocated for data-driven decision making by the district during the pandemic. As far back as June 2020, three months into the pandemic, Miller argued that the decision to return to in-person instruction should be part of a "cost-benefit analysis" that weighed the known harm of time lost in the classroom against the potential for infection with a deadly disease.
 
"I really wish we'd point to scientific studies or say that there are none or when the state makes mandates that they provide us justifications for these policies," Miller said at last week's School Committee meeting. "Are the masks that we have kids using, are they really that effective in the classrooms? It would be helpful as a committee member to have that information."
 
Elfenbein, who served on a joint labor-management committee to help make decisions about safety protocols during the pandemic, said the district was making decisions based on science.
 
"I think we looked at the data and made some really good decisions," Elfenbein said. "Of course, I'd like to err on the side of caution during a pandemic, especially closing in on a million American lives lost to it.
 
"I think moving forward we'll continue to look at the data that's more and more available about the efficacy of masking and the safety and efficacy of vaccines in terms of reducing and preventing hospitalization and death by a huge margin. I'm really proud of the work we've done and look forward to the work we'll continue to do to keep our kids in the schools and keep COVID out of our schools."
 
The bulk of last Thursday's School Committee meeting dealt with the budget for fiscal 2023 that the district will send to member towns Lanesborough and Williamstown this spring for approval at their annual town meetings.
 
Although the focus of a public hearing on the budget centered entirely on a potential $100,000 expenditure for a new position in the district office, most of a $1 million increase in the district's operating budget comes from other areas, including the usual contractual increase in salaries for union personnel but also anticipated fuel costs (both for heating and transportation), higher health insurance costs, planned maintenance on the district's 20-year-old elementary schools and added instructional staff.
 
In an effort to keep the increased assessments to Lanesborough and Williamstown as low as possible, McCandless and Assistant Superintendent of Business and Finance Joe Bergeron noted a couple of cost-saving measures: elevating a part-time English teacher at the middle-high school from a .6 (three days per week) position to full-time and using that teacher to fill the role of a reading interventionist sought by the school; and delaying an investment in technology.
 
"Within technology, we're currently, at least temporarily, placing investment on student and staff computer devices on hold," Bergeron said. "We're hoping that with additional clarity on grant opportunities as we look toward FY23, we'll be able to bring some of those investments back into FY23. But in an effort to pare down what we're presenting to you tonight, we have removed that from the picture right now."
 
In other business on Thursday, the School Committee voted to approve a 2022-23 school year calendar recommended by the administration.
 
The most noteworthy change on the schedule for next fall is a day off for the district on Tuesday, Sept. 6, the date of the primary election.
 
"When you look at the paperwork the town [of Williamstown] submits to the district for town voting to occur in the gymnasium, when you look at the numbers of those who would be coming in that day, I became very, very concerned," McCandless said. "The principal becomes very, very concerned, the staff, and I think some guardians and caregivers may become very, very concerned. Is this really as safe as it can be?"
 
Students in the district also will have the day off from classes on Tuesday, Nov. 8, for the general election, a professional development day for the district's faculty.

Tags: COVID-19,   MGRSD_budget,   


More Coronavirus Updates

Keep up to date on the latest COVID-19 news:


If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories