image description
Mount Greylock is now looking a natural grass field after years of discussing the possibility of a synthetic turf field.

Mount Greylock School Committee Advances Natural Grass Playing Field Plan

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Mount Greylock Regional School Committee voted Thursday to order design work for a new natural grass multi-sport athletic field at the middle/high school.
 
For the first time in the long and complicated history of the natural vs. synthetic turf field debate in the district, the committee voted to move forward with a field plan that does not include an artificial turf surface.
 
Carolyn Greene, the chair of the School Committee's Finance Subcommittee, reported that the latter panel decided at its late December meeting to recommend a field project that puts a natural grass playing field at the center of a new, six-lane artificial track.
 
Greene said the district has gained more knowledge and expertise in the last couple of years about how to maintain its existing playing fields to maximize playability, and a move to create a new natural grass field might progress without the level of opposition from community members that has met previous plans for an artificial turf field. 
 
"This is not just about the risks of synthetic turf or the political expediency of getting this done," Greene said, reading from a proposal advanced by the Finance Subcommittee by a vote of 2-0-1. "It is also about the benefits of creating a first-class, fully organic campus with a staff that can both model and share best practices with the rest of our district.
 
"A properly constructed and maintained grass field should be able to meet the playability needs of the district. It will also enable us to take other fields offline for reconstruction with a goal of having all seven fields (as well as baseball/softball fields) achieving maximum playability of modern grass fields."
 
Greene and Ursula Maloy voted in the subcommittee to advance the grass playing field proposal to the full committee. Steven Miller, a consistent proponent for an artificial turf field, abstained from the vote at the subcommittee level and again on Thursday in the full committee vote.
 
"I'm abstaining because I cannot vote before I know what the playable hours will be for everything," Miller said.
 
Julia Bowen, Christina Conry, Jose Constantine, Greene and Maloy each voted in favor of the natural grass field proposal on Thursday. Curtis Elfenbein did not attend Thursday's meeting.
 
The School Committee long has planned to finance a new multi-sport field at Mount Greylock with proceeds from a $5 million capital gift the middle/high school received from Williams College at the start of an addition/renovation project at the school.
 
Previous efforts to address a need for a more reliable playing field at the school have come up against higher than anticipated price tags and pushback from community members concerned about the environmental impact of a synthetic turf field, potential health risks to children using the field and the long-term cost of upkeep and, down the road, replacement of the carpet.
 
The Finance Subcommittee's report indicated that the cost savings from a less expensive grass field could have ripple effects in the now PreK-12 district (Williams College's gift predates a decision by Lanesborough and Williamstown to fully regionalize their public schools).
 
"Savings realized between synthetic and modern natural grass fields along with the expertise developed by our staff could potentially be invested in other district, school and community fields," Greene said. "So, we talked about that as well, that we're building a resource here that will benefit the entire school, the entire campus, potentially our other schools and potentially our towns."
 
In answer to a question Thursday from School Committee member Jose Constantine, district Business Manager Joe Bergeron said any design for a new natural grass field would include a plan for irrigating that field.
 
The district also may need to dig a new well and would look at ways to bring water to its existing playing fields, Bergeron said. That would be outside the scope of a plan to create a new playing field, but it could make sense to do the work concurrently.
 
"The process of drilling a new well, that's probably best parsed out for a local engineering firm that could go through the necessary surveys, test wells and, actually guiding the construction of those wells and the pipes necessary to run water to other parts of the campus," Bergeron said.
 
As for playing time on the fields, which has been the main argument raised by advocates for a synthetic turf field, the district reached out to two consultants, PJC Organic of Rowley and Huntress Associates of Andover. Bergeron reported their feedback to the Finance Subcommittee at its Thursday meeting that preceded the full committee's session.
 
According to the minutes of the Finance Subcommittee meeting, both experts gave largely the same advice. Specifically, Huntress advised that a natural grass field, allowed to rest during the summer, could be usable in the fall until frost sets in and in the spring from the third week in March, providing about 600 playable hours per year.
 
Bergeron on Thursday could not provide the subcommittee with a specific number of hours required.
 
But assuming the field is home for boys and girls soccer (up to 24 varsity home games per year), boys and girls lacrosse (again, up to 24 home dates for the varsity teams) and football (up to six home games per year), that equates to 54 contests, or 216 hours (assuming four hours per contest) before adding junior varsity games and practices, which hypothetically could be scheduled on other fields on the campus.

Tags: playing fields,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories