image description
A portion of an interior wall, left, will be removed to create more space for the apparatuses in the fire station.
image description
The nose of a Williamstown Fire Department engine is right up against the exterior bay door.
image description
Williamstown Fire District trucks are parked bumper to bumper in the Water Street station.

Wall to Be Moved to Make Space in Williamstown Fire Station

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Sheets of plywood keep the fire truck's bumper from hitting the back wall.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Fire District officials last week took a step forward in their efforts to build a new station and agreed to a small renovation to make the current cramped facility slightly more functional.
 
The five-person Prudential Committee that oversees the district voted last Monday to enter into a contract for design services on the new Main Street station. And the panel agreed to spend up to $14,000 to move an interior wall in the Water Street facility.
 
Fire Chief Craig Pedercini said the wall at the rear of the apparatus bay needs to come back about 4 feet, eliminating a closet and taking up between 1 and 2 feet of space in the station's meeting room at the rear of the structure.
 
The current arrangement of trucks, since the addition of a tanker earlier this spring, leaves two engines packed so tightly that the one in the rear is right up against the existing wall.
 
"We're going to lose meeting room space, but, on the other hand, we're going to be able to walk between our trucks, and the the guys won't have to step up on the bumpers to cross over from one side to the other," Pedercini said in a meeting telecast on the town's public access television station, Willinet. "I'm just worried, especially when the trucks are wet and we're washing them. I don't want somebody to slip and fall.
 
"Right now, it's a tough situation because in order to go around, you have either have to open the door in the front and walk outside or go around through the meeting room."
 
At the request of the Prudential Committee, Pedercini obtained quotes from three contractors to do the work. Two came in at $14,336 and $17,325, and the latter indicated he might not be able to do the work in October or November as the district hoped, Pedercini said.
 
The low bid, from Waldron and Associates Builders, was for $10,600 with the caveat the job may cost as much as $12,600.
 
"[Waldron] made a note in there saying if they had to make a fourth cut [to the existing wall], that will add an additional $2,000," Pedercini said. "But they think they don't have to. On the high end, this would be $12,600."
 
The job also will require an electrician at an expected cost of about $600, Prudential Committee Chair Richard Reynolds said. Committee member David Moresi suggested that the district also may want to address the floor that is being newly incorporated to the bay; currently, the meeting room has a tile floor, and Moresi noted that if that space gets wet when engines are being washed, the tile will "lift that up."
 
Moresi suggested that, with the addition of a small sum for unseen contingencies, the committee authorize Pedercini to spend up to $14,000 on the project.
 
In a separate series of votes, the committee authorized Reynolds to negotiate minor changes to a contract with Pittsfield architect EDM to design a station officials hope to build on a Main Street (Route 2) parcel next to Aubuchon Hardware.
 
The district's Building Committee recommended accepting the joint bid of EDM and its partner, Mitchell Associates, in early August, and the Prudential Committee has been working out the details of the design contract over the last month.
 
The most recent modification saw the district and architect agree to limit the scope of Phase 1, which EDM originally proposed to cost $157,000. The district needed to bring the cost down to $85,000, in line with what the appropriated funding it has in the fiscal year 2022 budget approved by district voters in the spring.
 
Reynolds told his colleagues that the new scoping letter moves some of the design work, like engaging a green engineer, out of the initial phase, but it is expected to be done later in the project.
 
"That doesn't mean we don't want to engage a green engineer," Reynolds said. "Because of the funds that we have available, some of the work won't take place under the services here."
 
Reynolds said some of that other design work could be covered by proceeds from a state grant for which the district has applied. The district may not know until January whether those grant funds will be awarded, he said.
 
"So, at the very least, we're trying to get ourselves to that point or give us an awareness of whether we're going to receive any funds, and, if not, then we'd have to consider a special district meeting so we can present to the community additional funds needed before the end of the fiscal year for them to be able to vote on it," Reynolds said. "And I'd assume that will include additional designer services and supplemental services that will allow us to move forward."

Tags: fire station,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories