image description
Members of the Building Committee and owner's project manager Anthony DiLuzio of Colliers International, front right, meet at the fire station on Wednesday. Chief Craig Pedercini joined the meeting by phone.

Williamstown Fire District Building Committee Makes Choice for Architect

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Williamstown Fire District Building Committee voted Wednesday to recommend the partnership of Mitchell Associates Architects and Pittsfield's EDM to design the new Main Street fire station.
 
In a narrow vote of the seven-member committee, the Mitchell/EDM group ranked slightly ahead of Cambridge's Galante Architecture Studio, the clear second favorite among four firms who responded to the district's request for proposals.
 
Last month, the Building Committee, which was appointed by the elected Prudential Committee that oversees the district, heard in-person presentations from the four respondents, a group that also included Cranston, R.I.'s, Saccoccio and Associates and Chcopee's Caolo and Bieniek, the firm that designed Williamstown's police station on Simonds Road.
 
At Wednesday afternoon's meeting, they discussed their impressions from the 45-minute presentation and Q&A sessions they held with each candidate. And four members of the committee reported to the group the results of reference checks they did on the firms.
 
"I think we can work with any of these firms," Building Committee Chair Elaine Neely said toward the end of the discussion.
 
But knowing that it needed to recommend just one to the Prudential Committee to be the district's architect of choice, each member of the committee reported his or her ranked order of preference for the proposals.
 
Mitchell Associates of Voorheesville, N.Y., and EDM were rated first by five of the seven committee members. TGAS or Galante, was ranked first by the other two, Prudential Committee member David Moresi and Neely.
 
All but one member ranked EDM and TGAS in their top two; Neely ranked the ultimate winner fourth. After Anthony DiLuzio of Colliers International, the district's owner's project manager, tallied the votes, Mitchell/EDM ended up with 11 points to 12 for TGAS. Caolo and Bieniek and Saccoccio finished with 21 and 26 points, respectively.
 
All of the feedback the committee received from its reference checks was positive for the firms under consideration, which was not surprising, considering the firms were asked to provide the references.
 
Mike Noyes, an assistant chief in the fire department, said that a former client of Bob Mitchell, principal of Mitchell and Associates, "eats, drinks and sleeps fire station design."
 
"Almost all said they would not trade him for anyone else and would use him again," Noyes said.
 
He also checked references on EDM. Past clients reported that the Pittsfield firm was always looking to find ways to save money and was communicative throughout the process.
 
"All of them said they would use EDM for another project if they had the opportunity," Noyes said.
 
Unlike the other three respondents, Mitchell and EDM were proposing to share the Williamstown fire station projects between two different architecture firms.
 
"One of the things that came out of their interview for me was, because they've done so many diverse projects, they're comfortable working with someone else who owns the design," DiLuzio advised the committee. "They're going to let Mitchell do what Mitchell does … and say, 'You give us where that needs to be, and we'll figure out the engineering to the electrical panel.' "
 
Firefighter Ryan Housman, who works in construction and serves on the Building Committee, told his colleagues it is not uncommon on bigger projects for a second architect to handle construction services once a design is in place.
 
Neely expressed concern about the fact that EDM and Mitchell had not worked with one another on such a project, but other members of the group sought to allay those fears.
 
"Mitchell, being highly rated, I take some comfort in Mitchell's own comfort about the ability of the marriage to work," Don Dubendorf said. "He could have put his own package together [without EDM]. It gives me comfort that he's so well regarded and he's comfortable with this assembled team."
 
"[Mitchell's] staking his reputation on it," Moresi added.
 
Jim Kolesar and others in the group commented that the Mitchell/EDM presentation had the advantage of including Williamstown's Guntlow & Associates on their team. Not only is engineer Charlie LaBatt familiar with the challenges of the Main Street site, LaBatt is familiar to the town boards that the district may face in the permitting process for a station at the Main Street (Route 2) site.
 
Mitchell/EDM also appeared to earn points with Building Committee members for their attention to Williamstown project going into last month's presentation.
 
"The other [presenters], the first 15 minutes were: These are the stations we've built," Housman said. "EDM said, ‘Here's your project. Here's what we're thinking about.' … I felt like EDM and Mitchell really thought about our project the most."
 
The Building Committee's recommendation goes to the Prudential Committee for ratification, a similar process to the one the district used to bring on Colliers as the OPM. Moresi said he thought the Prudential Committee would be able to call a special meeting as soon as Aug. 11. DiLuzio said he would ask Mitchell/EDM to work on a fee proposal in anticipation of the Prudential Committee vote and with the hope that the Building Committee could review the contract on Aug. 18, possibly lining up final ratification at the Prudential Committee's regularly scheduled meeting that day.

Tags: fire station,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories