image description
The state is planning to completely reconstruct a half-mile of East Street in fiscal 2026.

MassDOT Holds Public Hearing For East Street Reconstruction Proposal

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

The state is continuing to take written public comments on the East Street project. 

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Massachusetts Department of Transportation is in the 25 percent design stage of a $9 million to $10 million reconstruction of East Street, or Route 9.

On Thursday, MassDOT held a public hearing for the proposed overhaul that extends about a half-mile from the westerly side of East Street near Lyman Street to the easterly side at the intersection of Merril Road.

Project elements include widening of the existing roadway, turn lanes at intersections, a 14-foot grass median, reconstructed traffic signals, and infrastructure that is currently lacking.

The Federal Highway Administration is funding 80 percent of the total construction costs with MassDOT funding the additional 20 percent. It is scheduled to be programmed with the statewide Transportation Improvement Program in fiscal 2026.

The project goal is to improve safety, accessibility, and aesthetics with minimum impacts to the environment while supporting Pittsfield as a gateway city.

Several elements within the roadway prompted the need for a reconstruction proposal. MassDOT identified issues with traffic management, outdated equipment, and deficient accommodation for multi-modal forms of transportation including Americans with Disabilities Act accommodations.

Project engineer Paul Milewski described the current sidewalk conditions as "deteriorating." He also cited a lack of proper ADA compliance on a curb cut at Lyman Street looking East and a confusing unused driveway that is blocked by concrete barriers among other issues.

The corridor also has insufficient drainage which calls for a new stormwater drainage system included in the proposal.

This section of East Street is largely comprised of commercial and retail spaces with a couple of residential properties, all of which will be considered during the process.

During construction, roadways will remain open to vehicular traffic with lane shifts implements to keep two lanes open. Travel lanes may be reduced to one-lane traffic outside of rush hours to minimize disruption to travelers and abutters.

"We want to make sure we pay close attention to the abutters, those folks that are directly impacted by this project construction," Milewski said. "So we want to make sure we maintain access to all the residences and businesses while also considering access management."


In line with the city's efforts in accommodating multimodal means of traffic, the plan includes 5-foot wide buffered bike lanes on both sides of the roadway along with concrete sidewalks and ADA-compliant curb ramps.

Existing traffic signals at the intersection of East Street and Woodlawn Avenue and at the intersection of East Street and Merrill Road will also be reconstructed.

The team has identified environmental concerns that will be addressed with proper permitting and guidance. Concerns include stormwater management, the impact of wetlands, and contaminated soils containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) related to the former General Electric manufacturing operations on the site.

Consulting agencies involved in the proposal are the Pittsfield Conservation Commission, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the Army Corps of Engineers in relation to environmental concerns.

In addition, there are several steps of environmental permitting that are required.

The 25 percent design proposal was submitted in January 2017. Since then, there have been some design standards that have changed in relation to bike accommodations and extensive environmental permitting to satisfy requirements.

The expected design and permitting completion and right of way process is projected for winter of 2024-2025 and construction is slated to begin in 2026.  

The next steps for the project team are to continue to address comments on the 25 percent design, continue the permitting process, and maintain coordination with MassDOT and the City of Pittsfield.

Berkshire Regional Transportation Authority general manager Rauley Caine told the project team that the authority received requests from customers who want improved lighting at bus facilities and requested for that to be prioritized.

The city's Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales was also in attendance at the meeting and has been in conversation with the project team about the proposal.

Public input on the renovations is welcomed and encouraged. Written statements can be sent to:

Carrie Lavallee, P.E., Acting Chief Engineer, MassDOT, 10 Park Plaza, Boston, MA 02116, Attention: Project Management, Project File No. 604003.


Tags: MassDOT,   public hearing,   road work,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories