image description
The state is planning a roundabout for the intersection of U.S. 7 and Route 43 in South Williamstown.

MassDOT Receives Mostly Favorable Comments About Rotary Plan

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The state Department of Transportation is evaluating comments from a "virtual meeting" on a conceptual plan to install a rotary at the junction of Routes 7 and 43 in South Williamstown.
 
MassDOT collected 100 comments from the meeting in January and February and shared them with the town, which posted the responses on its website.
 
The majority of those who responded — 51 out of 100 — checked the box indicating they were in favor of the plan, with another seven saying they were "leaning" in favor and just 17 out of 100 saying they were not in favor.
 
The rest marked the boxes for "less in favor" (11) or neutral (14).
 
A MassDOT spokesperson said virtual meeting, which provide images and text to explain projects the state agency is considering, have been valuable tools during the COVID-19 pandemic.
 
"We are still in the process of evaluating the comments and the design process will progress," MassDOT's Judith Reardon Riley said. "The next milestone is the 25 percent design public hearing which will be scheduled. The hearing will be the next major opportunity for the public to submit formal comments, but we welcome them at any time."
 
Some users of the Route 7/43 intersection, known as the Five Corners, were expansive in making their case for or against the project.
 
"Hopefully this new roundabout and additional signage can be installed as soon as possible," one respondent wrote in the comments section. "I drive through this intersection several times a day. With the long downhill grade from the north and 45 mph, most cars seem to go faster than the speed limit. The crossing is very scary and I am always nervous about going through this intersection."
 
Safety was a priority for many of the respondents favoring the project.
 
"This is a very dangerous intersection," one wrote. "Years ago, before the current concrete curbs and double stop signs were installed on Route 43, I experienced a harrowing near miss here. I was driving south on Route 7 and had the right-of-way through the intersection. With no warning an eastbound car on Route 43 drove straight through the intersection without slowing down and stopping, passing inches behind my car. Just a fraction of a second saved us from a possibly fatal collision. To this day I am thankful that this near miss did not become a tragic accident.
 
"Generally, I am not a fan of traffic circles, but I think one would make this intersection much safer."
 
On the other hand, a different respondent argued that this particular intersection is ill-suited for a traffic circle.
 
"I personally think a roundabout in this location would cause more accidents than it would avert because you don't typically install roundabouts at the bottom of steep hills where big trucks can lose their brakes from slowing down over the distance just to make a roundabout safely," they wrote. "Plus in the winter time when there is a storm, the roundabout can easily be taken out by trucks or other vehicle sliding down the hill because they are unable to slow down enough to avoid plowing directly through the middle of the roundabout."
 
One respondent who identified as "neutral" on the question suggested an alternative to a rotary. They argued that a stop light (replacing the existing blinking red for Route 43 and blinking yellow for U.S. 7) would be less expensive and more effective.
 
MassDOT responded to that comment by pointing out that the agency is governed by the Federal Highway Administration's Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, which sets parameters for traffic volumes that warrant stop lights.
 
"The traffic volumes at the project location do not meet the minimum warrants," a MassDOT representative wrote. "Traffic signals at unwarranted locations have been shown to increase rear-end crashes and be detrimental to the intersection operation."
 
Most of the comments the agency received read like this one.
 
"I am a professional driver (CDL_A/hazmat/tanker). I drive through the 7/43 intersection on a regular basis in the course of a year. I have been driving through the intersection for over almost 40 years. Putting in a rotary at this intersection is a sound/scientific/common sense solution to making the intersection safer for everybody. I think it should happen as soon as possible, before any more innocent people are injured or killed by the poor design that exists there now."
 
One respondent, who said they were not in favor of a roundabout, offered an alternate solution that was unique.
 
"Just install an overpass at the base of the hill along Route 7 with Route 43 passing directly beneath the overpass," they wrote. "Then on both sides of the overpass you could have both on and off ramps so people could get where they need to go. This way the problem is solved and you don't have to worry about any more accidents from anyone cutting anyone else off or from people being unable to slow down due to the weather."
 
MassDOT's Riley indicated that kind of approach would be considerably more expensive than the estimated $1.5 million roundabout, which could go be designed and out to bid as early as 2023.
 
"A full interchange project would have significant cost implications, not to mention the negative impacts to adjacent property and environmental resources," Riley said. "Cost estimates based on concepts are proven unreliable, but with the size and scope of a larger project it would be a substantially higher cost."

Tags: MassDOT,   roundabout,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories