image description

Pittsfield Council Not Ready for In-Person Meetings

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — A majority of the City Council is not ready to discuss a return to in-person meetings just yet.

The council on Tuesday filed a petition from former mayoral candidate Craig Gaetani requesting the it vote on a plan to resume in-person meetings 8-3 with Ward 4 councilor Chris Connell, Ward 2 Councilor Kevin Morandi, and Ward 1 Councilor Helen Moon voting in opposition.

A motion to approve was originally on the floor for discussion but the motion to file took precedent.

President Peter Marchetti explained that he put this petition on the agenda because he knows there is a mix of opinions among council members.

"I want you to know that I continue to look at what our colleagues across the state do," he added. "We're not meeting remotely because we've chosen to meet remotely."

Marchetti has reached out to the Massachusetts Municipal Councilors Association to ask how many colleagues are conducting in-person meetings and has not yet received a response.

He said when given the guidance to do so, it is his intention to find a way to go back into chambers when it is safe.

One area of concern is violation of the Open Meeting Law if residents are restricted from in-person meetings after the state-mandated allowance of 50 people per gathering is exceeded. City Solicitor Stephen Pagnotta confirmed that turning away a 51st person would be an OML violation unless the meeting is closed and rescheduled for another day.

"My concern councilors, especially as we approach the budget season, there's been a lot of communication in regards to the department budget and there's always a lot of communication in regards to the School Department budget," Marchetti said. "I don't want to schedule a budget hearing and then have to cancel it because I have to turn people away and we have an Open Meeting Law violation."


Morandi and Connell are in favor of planning a return to the Council Chambers or a larger destination for social distancing.

"I realize we're in a pandemic but the schools are starting to open up now," Morandi said. "We have a lot of people reaching out to us that want to be heard and it's very hard on Zoom, calling in here, and especially with the budget, times coming up, and everything. I think we should do the best we can to try to accommodate having it in a good-sized building where people could come and say what they got to say."

Connell believes that the Zoom platform is prohibiting people from voicing their opinions on city matters.

"We are shutting off people are from responding to issues that come up in front of the city because they cannot go on Zoom, they have problems going on Zoom," he said. "I think we need make every effort to ensure that when things loosen up, whether it's a larger building, a larger amount of data gathering, observing social distancing, that we should use it."

Ward 7 Councilor Anthony Maffuccio pointed out that in a press conference on the same day, Gov. Charlie Baker encouraged more than 20,000 jobs to be pivoted to remote and that only 9.6 percent of the United States is currently vaccinated.

"I think we would put the general population at risk. I think we will put one or another at risk. And I do believe that things should stay as they are for now until otherwise directed by the governor," he said. "I don't think the City Council should be taking a vote on this, because we really have no authority to override the governor's decision."

Moon agreed that public health is not in a place to permit in-person meetings though she finds it ironic that the council isn’t permitted to meet in person when children have returned to schools.

She pointed out that the petition asks for a plan to resume in-person meetings, not for immediate resumption.


Tags: COVID-19,   Pittsfield city council ,   


More Coronavirus Updates

Keep up to date on the latest COVID-19 news:


If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Berkshire Community Action Council Rumors Hurt Fundraising Efforts

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

Most of you are familiar with BCAC. We are the federally designated anti-poverty agency for Berkshire County, serving nearly 12,000 families each year. We work hard to maintain the trust and respect of the communities we serve.

Overseen by the Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities, we are required to comply each year with a rigorous 78 performance standards which govern all aspects of our organization. Proudly, we can boast that we are consistently 100 percent compliant with these standards which range from our community involvement, our transparency in reporting, our administration of programs, our financial accountability and much more. This positions us as one of the best run agencies in the commonwealth. Furthermore, as part of these standards, we are required to survey the community each year to assess satisfaction with our services.

This year, as in years past, we received an overwhelmingly positive response from our community. We just closed our online survey. With 436 individuals responding, 96.7 percent of those surveyed reported that they were either satisfied or very satisfied with the services they received and for how families were treated. We pride ourselves on our accountability using less than 10 percent of our revenues each year to pay for administration.

Given this, we were shocked to hear that there are members of our community who are spreading untruthful accusations about our programs. We pride ourselves on the collaborative way we work with our partners in the community. We have always recognized that we can accomplish more when we work together. We have shared our resources with the community, not looking for recognition but for the sheer satisfaction of knowing that we are able to help close service gaps and serve more families in need of help. So, these rumors are not only hurtful but very damaging to our programming and reputation.

This year, donors have reported that they have heard these damaging rumors, and it is impacting our ability to raise funds to purchase the coats and boots for our Children's Warm Clothing program. I want to assure you that we administer our programs under the highest standards and always with the utmost respect for our families and their well-being. I am asking if anyone is concerned about rumors you have heard, to please contact me directly so that I can address these issues personally.

I can be reached at dleonczyk@bcacinc.org or call the office at 413-445-4503.

Deborah Leonczyk
Pittsfield, Mass. 

 

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories