image description

Mount Greylock Turf Field Bids Come in Higher than Hoped

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Dan Caplinger, right, opens sealed bids as fellow committee member Al Terranova looks on.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Mount Greylock Regional School District opened three bids Friday morning for proposed projects to improve athletic fields at the middle-high school.
 
All three were well above the figures targeted by the School Committee for the projects.
 
Clark Construction of Westfield, Mountain View Landscapes and Lawncare of Chicopee and RAD Sports of Rockland submitted bids ranging from $2.847 million to $2.984 million — an average of about $2.901 million — to install a new artificial turf playing field and make requirements to existing fields required under the Americans With Disabilities Act and Title IX.
 
When it decided in May to put the projects out to bid, the School Committee identified a target of $2.1 million for the work, based on the projections of the district's architect.
 
The committee's intention is to fund the work from the proceeds of a $5 million capital gift given by Williams College at the start of the district's $64 million addition/renovation project at Mount Greylock.
 
Field work — including that required under the ADA and Title IX — was left out of the main building project because the Massachusetts School Building Authority caps the amount of money that can be spent on "site work" in a Massachusetts School Building Authority project. The Mount Greylock project reached that cap long before the fields were included.
 
Although the original Williams College gift has appreciated as part of the college's endowment while waiting to be spent by the district, the School Committee has identified other needs it hopes to address with the proceeds: replacing the district administration offices that were housed in the old Mount Greylock (another expense outside the MSBA cost-sharing plan) and creating a fund for future large capital needs (new roofs, boilers, etc.).
 
The district's Phase 2 subcommittee, which developed plans for the field improvements and drafted the RFP issued by the regional school district, is scheduled to meet Monday at 6:15 p.m. to consider the bids.
 
"I think the expectation is the subcommittee will consider the bids and, if so inclined, make a recommendation to the full committee," said Williamstown's Dan Caplinger, who serves on the elected School Committee and the appointed Phase 2 subcommittee.
 
The full School Committee is set to meet again on Thursday, Sept. 26, at 6 p.m.
 
Cost aside, the proposal to install an artificial turf field has generated considerable opposition in the community from critics who point to uncertainty over the health risk associated with artificial turf and impact on the environment from the plastic "grass" and "crumb rubber" infill, made from recycled tires.
 
On Friday, two critics of the planned artificial turf field attended the bid opening: Stephanie Boyd and Ann O'Connor — each an elected official in Williamstown but not acting in their official capacities on the Planning Board and Select Board, respectively.
 
Boyd asked Caplinger whether there would be an opportunity for public comment at the Sept. 26 special meeting of the School Committee. He said he did not know, as no agenda was posted yet, but he encouraged her to reach out to School Committee Chairwoman Regina DiLego to ask for a public comment agenda item.
 
Whichever way the seven School Committee members come down on the pros and cons of artificial turf, the fiscal ramifications of Friday's bid opening likely will be significant.
 
Clark Construction came in with the low bid, $2.847 million, of which $1.332 million was specified for procurement and installation of the turf field. Mountain View's bid was $2.895 million ($1.054 million for the turf field). RAD Sports' bid was $2.984 million ($1.532 million for the field).
 
The district's request for proposals also included two "add alternates" for the bid: installation of a quarter-mile track on a different parcel than the turf field and utilization of BrockFill, an organic alternative to the crumb rubber typically used as infill on contemporary artificial turf fields.
 
There was considerably more variation in the quotes on the add alternates than on the "base bid."
 
For the track, the bids were: $549,000 (Clark), $650,000 (Mountain View) and $879,000 (R.A.D. Sports).
 
For the BrockFill infill alternative, the bids were: $153,000 (Clark), $64,500 (Mountain View) and $130,000 (RAD Sports).
 
The add alternate process allows the School Committee to accept only the base bid or the base bid in combination with one or more of the alternates. Likewise, bidders can choose to make a bid or not for the add alternate; in this case, each one did.

Tags: bidding,   MGRHS school project,   MGRSD,   turf field,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories