image description

Only One Complaint Lodged Against Mount Greylock Superintendent

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Despite a maelstrom of social media chatter and an online petition that generated nearly 250 signatures, the Mount Greylock Regional School district has to date received just one formal complaint against its superintendent in the nearly three years she has occupied the corner office.
 
Superintendent Kimberley Grady has directed the district continuously since she was appointed acting superintendent in the fall of 2016.
 
The district has received one formal complaint against her, in March of this year.
 
In Grady's capacities as acting superintendent and later superintendent, she has answered directly to the Mount Greylock Regional School Committee and its antecedent committees at Lanesborough Elementary, Williamstown Elementary and Mount Greylock middle-high school prior to the district's full regionalization in 2018.
 
This spring, a Facebook post from a now former employee at Lanesborough Elementary was circulated widely on social media. In it, Grady is accused of being "smart, diabolical, and down right underhanded [sic]."
 
The nearly 500-word Facebook post does not include any specific allegations of incidents at any of the three schools, but it does include a call for Grady's supervisory body, the School Committee, to take action.
 
"Our School committee [sic] needs to get their heads out of the sand and wake up before our school district is run into the ground," the post read.
 
The Facebook post was followed up by an online petition that lists 15 positions in the three-school district that had been vacated since July 2016 — a period that includes four months of Grady's predecessor, then-Superintendent Douglas Dias.
 
"It cannot be that the School Committee views such turnover as routine, let alone indicative of effective and appropriate top-level leadership," the petition reads.
 
A printed copy of the online petition was later hand-delivered to the School Committee during a meeting.
 
In the weeks following the Facebook post and petition, iBerkshires.com repeatedly asked for details of any allegations against the superintendent that have been considered by the committee, but those requests were declined on the advice of the district's counsel because of confidentiality issues.
 
On May 15, iBerkshires.com submitted a request under the commonwealth's public records act that sought the answer to a narrowly drawn question: "the number(s) of actionable, formal, written accusations of misconduct, mismanagement or abuse of district personnel that have been brought to the attention of her supervising body, the Mount Greylock Regional School Committee (and its predecessors: the Williamstown Elementary School Committee, Lanesborough Elementary School Committee and Mount Greylock 'Transition Committee')."
 
The request specified the time periods covered to include Grady's time as acting/interim superintendent, the time in which the Transition Committee was conducting a search for a full-time superintendent and since last April, when she was offered the job as full-time superintendent.
 
On Wednesday, Mount Greylock's records access officer, Jonathan Nopper, sent a written reply.
 
"In response to this request, the District would like to inform you that there has been one (1) formal complaint made against Ms. Grady, which occurred while employed as Superintendent of the District. Said complaint was emailed to the School Committee on Friday, March 21, 2019," Nopper wrote.
 
The letter does not note the complainant or the nature of the request. That information was not requested by iBerkshires.com because it likely would have triggered confidentiality and privacy concerns both for the accuser and accused.
 
The date of the one formal complaint the district has received was 19 days after the March 2 Facebook post that touched off the current controversy.
 
The controversy has been brought into School Committee meetings on a couple of occasions. The original Facebook poster has taken to attending meetings with a bright red anti-bullying T-shirt (the March 2 post refers to Grady as a "bully"). And a newspaper article about the petition prompted a comment from the floor during one of the committee's monthly meetings.
 
On March 27, The Berkshire Eagle ran a story about the issue that included an indirect quote from the chair of the School Committee, Joe Bergeron, that made it sound like the committee was not able effectively to supervise the superintendent.
 
"[T]here is not a set procedure for dealing with complaints about a superintendent other than during the annual employee performance evaluation process," the story reads in an indirect quote paraphrasing comments attributed to Bergeron.
 
"Any complaint is reviewed by school committee members individually and by the district's legal counsel," Bergeron said on Friday. "The district's legal counsel reviews and advises with knowledge of federal and state laws and the Superintendent's contract. If advised, the school committee then discusses specific charges or complaints following the Massachusetts General Laws regarding employment and the Open Meeting Law. 
 
"The Berkshire Eagle's 'paraphrased comment' was not regarding the school committee's procedures for handling of specific complaints or charges."
 
Two weeks after that article ran in The Eagle, the School Committee was addressed by a leader of Mount Greylock's teachers union during the public comment portion of one of the committee's meetings.
 
"The Mount Greylock Educators Association feels strongly that the School Committee has an ongoing responsibility to evaluate district administration and operations and should have a procedure at the ready to adequately deal with these types of situations," Marty Walter said.

Tags: complaints,   superintendent,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories