The sewer rate increase will be particularly front-loaded with a 50 percent hike at the start of 2019, should the City Council approve the plan. That would raise the current rate to $362.34 per year -- an increase of $114.65 per year for a household with two toilets -- effective Jan. 1, 2019.
There is no proposed increase in fiscal 2020, a 15 percent increase in FY21, no increase in FY22, 12 percent in FY23, and then calls for no increases in FY24 and FY25.
By the end, the total bill for a household with two toilets -- which makes up the majority of the unmetered households -- the bill will go from $247.69 annually to $466.69 annually.
The meter rate will see the same percentage increase, going from $1.91 per 100-cubic feet to $3.69 per 100-cubic feet.
"My administration inherited this EPA-required wastewater treatment plant upgrade. It came without a plan for how to get it done or how to pay for it. When we came into office, we were headed down this path of potential violations of the EPA's requirements for us to do this upgrade and the potential for fines," Tyer said.
She later added, "we have built this plan and we are going to work this plan."
The city is well underway in getting construction going on the wastewater treatment plant, with the bids for general contractors expected to be opened next Wednesday. The city is under an administrative order by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to lower the levels of phosphorous and aluminum in the water coming out of the plant.
The consultants, Kleinfelder, crafted a design to do that as well as introduce a nitrogen optimization process as well -- a process the consultants say will likely have to be addressed in the future.
The issue dates back to 2008 when the EPA renewed the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit and set the levels higher. The city fought the new levels in court but ultimately lost. In 2012, the city put $1 million toward the design and, in 2015, the EPA signed an order requiring the plant to be under construction by August 2018.
Most of the first half of this year the City Council spent many hours and late evenings hotly debating the project, particularly because of the cost it will have on residents.
"There has been what I would describe as misguided speculation, inaccuracies, fear tactics, all expressed in public spaces about the impact this essential upgrade to the city's wastewater treatment plant will have on ratepayers," Tyer said.
Money in that initial design allocation was eyed for a rate study, which Tyer said was done by Russell Consulting out of Newburyport.
"This is the big money. This is what everybody is so anxious about. How could we possibly be spending $74 million on an upgrade and not have our rates go up 8,000 times or 800 times or whatever scare tactic you want to use," Tyer said.
The consultants charted out where the city needs to go with the rates to cover operations, maintenance and upgrades over the next seven years, and presented a multitude of options.
Director of Finance Matthew Kerwood said the choice was made to front-load the rate increase more heavily to help build reserves in the wastewater enterprise account. He said the debt payments don't start until the construction is completed in 2021 so the rate structure is partly saving up to pay for the work.
"Part of the strategy is to building up some of those reserves and be prepared for when that actually does happen," Kerwood said.
The city has secured a $50 million loan through the state's Clean Water Trust Fund. That will carry a low-interest rate of 2 percent. In conversations with the state, Kerwood said the rest is also expected to come from a 2019 allocation from the same fund, with the same terms.
Commissioner of Public Services David Turocyadded that there are additional ways some of that loan could be reduced to zero percent, but not all of it.
"It is federal money that is given to the state for these purposes. Every state runs it differently, some states do put out zero-interest loans and at one point Massachusetts did. But they changed the philosophy and now put it out at 2 percent and the idea behind that is the interest that is paid expands the pool of money available," Kerwood said.
The rate plan coincides with construction on the plant that is mandated to start by Jan. 15, 2019, following an extension of the order the EPA gave after the City Council begrudgingly approved the project. It is set to be completed by 2021 and the city is required to be in full compliance with its permit in 2022.
"We will have done the right thing. We will have upgraded our wastewater treatment plant to protect our environment but also have this infrastructure that will serve many generations for years to come," Tyer said.
Tyer said she recognized the effect that the increased rates will have on the citizens and highlighted her administration's move to an electrical aggregation program, lowering the property tax rate, and reaching an agreement with city employees to save the budget from substantial health insurance increases.
"We are always on the lookout for how we can save our citizens money," Tyer said.
Waterwater is only one part of the bill, however. The water rates are also going up in anticipation with projects, albeit at a somewhat smaller scale, for that system.
A water bill rate hike of 20 percent will be effective Jan. 1, 2019 -- raising the annual bill from $278.22 to $333.80 per year, or $55.58 per year. Future increases to the water bill aren't quite known because the project and timelines aren't fully developed.
"We know more on the sewer side. On the water side, we know what we don't know in that some of the capital projects on the water side are in outer years and depending on how we go, we may or may not do those projects, do them differently, or maybe not as large scale. There is still some work on the water side as to what we actually do for capital projects," Kerwood said.
The water and sewer charges are on the same quarterly bill. Residents can expect an increase in the price they pay each quarter to rise by $42.56 for both water and sewer. The percentage changes remain across the board for those with more or less than two toilets.
For more information, read our prior stories on the topic below.
Begrudgingly, the City Council approved a $74 million upgrade to the wastewater system, which is estimated to more than double sewer bills within the next three years. The city has been under an administrative order form the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to lower the levels of phosphorous and aluminum in the water coming out of the plant. The project proposed by the consultants, Kleinfelder, also called for a nitrogen optimization process as well.
The City Council rejected a $74 million capital request to renovate the wastewater treatment center in the early hours of Wednesday morning. Shortly before 12:30 a.m. the request from Mayor Linda Tyer to borrow for upgrades to the plant fell one vote short of the supermajority needed. Councilors Christopher Connell, Melissa Mazzeo, Kevin Morandi, and Donna Todd Rivers all voted down the project.
The administration is seeking authority to borrow the $74 million in an effort to comply with an EPA administrative order, which calls for significantly decreasing the amount of phosphorus, and aluminum treatment, released into the Housatonic River. The plan developed in consultation with Kleinfelder also calls for a nitrogen optimization process.
The City Council's finance subcommittee is recommending that the city hold off on borrowing $74 million to make major repairs to the wastewater system.
The City Council doesn't want to rush into making a $74 million decision. Mayor Linda Tyer had put forth a petition calling for the borrowing of $74 million for a massive project with the wastewater system. The city is under an administrative order from the Environmental Protection Agency holding the system to higher standards of phosphorus, aluminum treatment, and nitrogen removal. The project has been in design for about a year, coming after years of ultimately losing appeals in federal cou
The mayor is asking for the authority to borrow $74 million for a major upgrade of the city's wastewater treatment center. The expense has been a long time coming, starting with the city seeking to renew its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit in 2005. The Environmental Protection Agency oversees those permits in an effort to keep waterways clean and had issued a permit in 2008 requiring significantly higher standards of phosphorus, aluminum treatment, and nitrogen removal.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?
Letter to the Editor
To the Editor:
A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.
This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.
Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.
If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.
Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.
Some residents received an "alarming" notice from the Water Department about the possibility of lead pipes or solder in some homes, but officials assured them not to worry. click for more
The William Stanley Business Park is transforming from grey to greener. Site 9 is nearly completed and funds have been secured to ready Sites 7 and 8 for development. click for more