image description
Some 6,500 of these low-lying solar panels will be installed on Silver Lake Boulevard this summer.

WMECo Solar Array Prompts Interest in Business Park

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Peter Clarke, president of WMECo, speaks about the $10 million, 1.8-MW project in Pittsfield's William Stanley Business Park.
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The empty lot across from Silver Lake will soon be sprouting thousands of solar panels as Western Massachusetts Electric Co. installs the biggest solar array in New England thus far.

The crop may also have business blooming at the long-gestating William Stanley Business Park, William M. Hines Sr. said Monday as partners, stakeholders and local officials gathered to celebrate the start of construction on the 1.8-megawatt photovoltaic system.

"The publicity about the pending solar project has already generated additional interest in businesses who are inquiring about the Williams Stanley Business Park," said the head of the Pittsfield Economic Development Authority. "Especially green and eco-enterprises."

The array is the first and largest of its kind in New England, but the $10 million project is just the first solar facility being planned by WMECo. Pittsfield was chosen as the first site after looking at a number of other so-called "Gateway Cities" flush with languishing industrial lands and brownfields.

Pittsfield's "very progressive leadership was what really allowed us to do the deal quickly and get the project done," said WMECo President and Chief Executive Officer Peter Clarke as the heavy machinery could be heard in the background clearing land on the south side of the utility's substation on Silver Lake Boulevard.

The early afternoon sun was high in the sky (WMECo even brought dark shades for attendees) but Hines described the city, the business park and the electric utility as "a true coming together of a perfect storm for this project."

The 6,500-panel installation will be built on eight acres; six owned by WMECo and two by PEDA. In between them is the substation that will allow energy to be distributed into the system.


The empty lot next to the WMECo substation is being prepped for the panels' installation.
Clarke said the cost of the project is being defrayed in part by federal tax credits and that consumers will see a small renewable charge — less than 30 cents a month — over the life of the project. Photovoltaic-produced energy is more expensive now, but he expects costs to drop over the long term as the project is paid off and as green technology advances.

"We know the technology will work, we know it's proven," he said. "We will measure the economics but what we believe ... is that developing larger arrays will bring the economies of scale into play so the fixed costs go down as you spread it over more units."

"We know it's a repeatable progam and we'll demonstrate that this site makes a lot of sense."

WMECo is investing more than $18 million in energy efficiency this year, said Clarke. "We are working with consumers to conserve first and to develop indigenous renewable like solar, maybe someday eventually wind power, to be able to replace foreign oil and coal with renewable energy."

Gov. Deval Patrick has set a goal of 250 MW of solar by 2017; under the Green Communities Act, utilities can produce up to 50 MW. WMECo is authorized for 6 MW and its Pittsfield installation will make up a nearly a third of that.

That project is expected to generate 70 construction jobs and bring in about $150,000 in property taxes for the city once it's completed this fall. The contractor is American Capital Energy of Chelmsford. For the beleaguered PEDA, it finally gets a tenant in the park — one that's sparking serious interest in the former GE site.


William M. Hines Jr., being interviewed by our media partner Berkshire News Network, said the array is sparking an interest in the business park.
"They're starting to see it as a green-energy, green business type of park," said Hines of the recent inquiries. "We've got one interested right now in developing green energy buildings."

Mayor James M. Ruberto said the array and the work done between so many entities — from the city, to the state, to GE, PEDA, WMECo and Massachusetts Electric, and more — showed that together they could "forge something truly dramatic."

"I think it's going to be a great addition to the park as people come in and look at prospective site for their business to see this progressive solar energy that's out here," said Clarke. "And I think it really puts Pittsfield on the map as a progressive city."
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories