image description
Teachers' association President Susan Chilson said the union members 'must abide by the rules of their working agreement; they only expect that the same courtesy be offered in return.'

North Adams Needs $396,000 to Fund Insurance Trust

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Councilor Gailanne Cariddi questioned whether the city should accept the study or do an audit.
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — The city may have to ask the Legislature for more time to come up with the $396,000 needed to fully fund the self-insurance trust for this fiscal year.

The state Department of Revenue has informed the city that it must make the payment, Mayor Richard Alcombright told the City Council on Tuesday night.

"I have no idea where it will come from, but the Department of Revenue said we must fund it for 2010," he said. "But we may need special legislation to push it into next year or to push it out further".

The study that came out last week showed the city had underfunded the trust by some $1.1 million over 2008 and 2009, a situation that has spilled into fiscal 2010. The city's public unions have claimed their own analysis shows the city shorted the fund by $1.8 million over three years.

Both Councilors Gailanne Cariddi and Michael Bloom called for more extensive audits.

Cariddi was concerned that the mayor was moving forward with negotiations with the union and state on the sole basis of the study. "You seem to be going in a direction like this is the last document we're going to hear."


Mayor Richard Alcombright
Related Stories
• North Adams to Open Insurance Talks With Unions
• North Adams Council Rejects Insurance Review
• Barrett Challenges Unions on GIC, Insurance Trust
• North Adams Researching Insurance Claims
Report: North Adams Underfunded Insurance Fund by $1.1M
Bloom said an audit would put the issue to rest. "People are asking where the council was on this," he said. "There was a management decision made at some point not to fund it properly."

An audit would cost upwards of $40,000 to $50,000 compared to the $2,500 for the two-year study, said Alcombright, and wouldn't likely show anything different than what the study has.

In fact, previous audits hadn't shown any underfunding since they were focused on ensuring that claims going out were being covered by premiums coming in. The city paid its insurance bills, said Alcombright, but what it hadn't done was fully pay its share of the premiums as required by state law. In failing to do so, it had also left the fund short in case of runout, or claims coming in after the fiscal year, should it decide to switch to a different insurance.

The mayor also wanted to refute several assertions in a recent article (and editorial) in the North Adams Transcript, including one that the accounting was a matter of creative financing.

"'Creative financing,' I got a big kick out of that," he said. "Mass General Law governs the payments on the self-insured trust. You cannot be creative with Mass General Law."

Both Cariddi and Alcombright referred to a letter DOR sent to Wareham when that town asked last fall if could just pay costs this year. DOR's answer was a firm no: "We have interpreted GL c. 32B, 53A as requiring that the town contribute a specific percentage of the previously determined premium or rate amount, at least by year end."


Councilor David Bond: 'I am ashamed of the findings.'
The law, Chapter 32B, Section A, does not appear to include any penalties, said Alcombright. The city is working on changing its accounting practices and is in talks with the unions on how to proceed. It may have to offer a premium holiday or make a one-time payment into the trust fund.

Councilor David Bond waited until councilor's concerns to read a statement expressing his anger and embarrassment over the situation.

"This promises to be one of the most difficult budgets to balance and now have a very cumbersome and difficult expense ... What else is out there and what else is the city liable for?

"I am ashamed by the findings in this report and the further malfeasance that may be out there."
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

North Adams Takes Possession of Historic Church Street Houses

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff

The porch collapsed on 116 Church several years ago. 
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — The state Land Court in February finalized the city's tax taking of four properties including the brick Church Street mansions.
 
The prestigious pair of Queen Anne mansions had been owned by Franklin E. Perras Jr., who died in 2017 at age 79. 
 
The properties had been in court for four years as attempts were made repeatedly to find Perras' heirs, including a son, Christopher. According to court filings, Christopher reportedly died in 2013 but his place of death is unknown, as is the location (or existence) of two grandchildren listed in Perras' obituary. 
 
Mayor Jennifer Macksey said the next steps will be to develop requests for proposals for the properties to sell them off. 
 
She credited Governor's Councillor Tara Jacobs for bringing the lingering tax takings to the Land Court's attention. Jacobs said she'd asked about the status of the properties and a few days later they were signed off. 
 
It wasn't just the four North Adams properties — the cases for three Perras holdings in Lanesborough that also had been in the court for years were closed, including Keeler Island. Another property on Holmes Road in Hinsdale is still in the court.  
 
The buildings at 116, 124 and 130 Church St., and a vacant lot on Arnold Place had been in tax title since 2017 when the city placed $12,000 in liens. 
 
View Full Story

More North Adams Stories