image description
A dozen people rally for climate legislation at Park Square.

Environmentalists Push for Climate Legislation

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Local environmentalists joined statewide rallies for climate legislation on Tuesday, pushing the passage of four bills for cleaner air and energy.

A dozen people gathered in Park Square holding signs with pleas such as “Let our grandchildren have a future” and “We need clean air.”  The Berkshire Environmental Action Team urged attendees to advocate for S.2135 for a gas moratorium, HD.2474/ SD.1180 and HD.2474/ SD.1108 for clean air, and HD.4024/ SD.505 for just energy citing.

“The whole point of this is Mass legislative sessions last for two years. For the last three sessions, bills have always stalled out until the very last minute,” said Rosemary Wessel, program director for No Fracked Gas in Mass.

“Some of you may remember two years ago we were here 11 days before the session because they were saying ‘Meh, we might not pass an energy bill, things aren't working out for us,’ So we want to make sure that they're on the ball earlier this year.”

Executive Director Jane Winn emphasized that No Fracked Gas in Mass, BEAT, the 350 MA Berkshire Node, and Mass Power Forward joined ten simultaneous rallies for climate legislation with this event.

“This is happening all across the state,” she said.

It is now 60 days until the end of the session and Wessel said there are many bills that need to be resolved, reconciled, or put into an omnibus energy bill.  She pointed to a spat between chairs of the state Telecommunications, Utilities, and Energy Committee earlier this year that divided the panel for separate hearings and resulted in less communication.

“They've resolved their differences but things still aren't going through that fast and we're now 93% of the way through this legislative session,” she said.

“They have good legislation in front of them. They need to get working on it now because when these bills get left to the last minute, that's time for the utility companies to get to them, it’s time for the lobbyists to get to them to tinker with the wording.”

Wessel reported that Sen. Paul Mark, who is on the committee, and State Rep. Tricia Farley Bouvier have championed the legislation.

“When we brought up concerns to (Mark,) he actually relayed them to the committee heads as well,” she added. “So he's been helping push them forward as much as there has been movement forward.”

Deputy Director Brittany Ebeling explained that these bills are “no brainers” and to meet the state's decarbonization goals, will support the state in moving forward equitably and with justice toward decarbonizing.

The gas moratorium bill asks for legislation to establish a moratorium on new gas system expansion.  It is currently before the Senate Committee on Ways and Means.

“This bill is pointing to the fact that we need to transition away from fossil fuels, we need to curb our state's emissions, and by doing so, invest in clean energy infrastructure,” she said.



“We shouldn't be pouring money into building new gas infrastructure and we should be building clean energy in a way that uplifts our communities in an equitable fashion.”

Bill HD.2474/ SD.1180, now S.1382, asks for legislation to improve outdoor and indoor air quality for communities burdened by transportation pollution.

“We know that even in Pittsfield between different neighborhoods in this community, there is a 12-year life expectancy difference between certain neighborhoods that have been formerly redlined that are facing a lot of the effects of environmental injustice and neighboring areas that are not experiencing those effects,” Ebeling explained.

“A lot of that has to do with air pollution and so this act is supporting the idea that we know breathing clean air is a matter of life and health and it requires monitoring and it requires monitoring and taking action when there are instances of unclean air that burden the most already affected community members.”

This requires monitoring and taking action where there are instances of unclean air that burden already affected community members.

The other clean air bill, now H.3232, asks for legislation to establish a zero-carbon renovation fund for the costs associated with energy-efficiency renovations of certain existing buildings.

Ebeling explained that this will invest in an equitable energy transition that uplifts the most affected community members while meeting the state decarbonization targets.

The energy siting bill, now H.3187, is an act relative to energy facilities siting improvements to address environmental justice, climate, and public health.

“We know that environmental justice communities are already bearing the brunt of environmental injustice and have been historically excluded from decision-making when the question arises, ‘Where should we site this energy facility? Should it go in this neighborhood? What will the environmental effects be for people breathing this air, living next to this water?’” Ebeling explained.

“And so we're pushing for the inclusion of all community members in the decision-making process who will be most affected by the siting of these facilities and asking for their voices to be heard before decisions are made so that we can share in the benefits of a clean energy future together.”

Wessel explained that they are particularly interested in reaching the chairs of the Telecommunications, Utilities, and Energy Committee, Sen. Michael Barrett and Rep. Jeffrey Roy, with the advocacy. 

They would also like to get the attention of the House speaker and Senate president, "Because they have all been in part of the process of stalling progress on clean energy legislation and environmental justice legislation. They're the ones who are dragging their feet and they're the ones who can move things forward more quickly.”



 


Tags: environment,   legislation,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Dalton Division Road Project in Pre-25 Percent Design Stage

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
DALTON, Mass. — The town's engineers say there is still time to work through the Dalton Division Road project’s design and permitting process. 
 
In December, the Select Board voted to advocate for Concept A, which would have sidewalks on both sides, a 5-foot bike lane in the road on both sides with a buffer, and a 2-foot painted buffer between the vehicle lane and in the bike lane. They also recommended the two-way stop control option. 
 
Since that decision, there have been sentiments to revisit this decision to reduce the cost and improve safety at the intersection off Williams Street, Washington Mountain Road, and Mountain Road. 
 
The original vote would have been the most expensive and "certainly not" the engineer or the state's "preferred design," Town Manager Thomas Hutcheson said during a meeting in November. 
 
During last week's Select Board meeting, Fuss & O'Neil project manager and senior traffic engineer Steve Savaria represented the options, explained potential obstacles, and demonstrated the next steps. Present board members have yet to vote on their final choice. 
 
The project is still in the pre-25 percent design stage and is currently on the fiscal year 2029 Transportation Improvement Program list, so there is "plenty of time" to work out the details. 
 
Since the original vote, some board members have shifted their opinion toward advocating for the most feasible and timely option with a "path of least resistance to get this project done." 
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories