Defense stocks have soared since the outset of the Ukraine-Russian conflict. That is a typical reaction to geopolitical strife. Frequently, investors bid up the sector only to sell these stocks once peace returns. This time may be different.

 

Vladimir Putin has put the world, and specifically Europe, on notice that he is bound and determined to resurrect the formal might of the USSR, no matter how long it takes. His actions have caused a sea of change in Europe's decades-long freeze on defense spending. Germany is a prime example of what analysts believe will be the beginning of a new era of inflated European defense budgets.

 

In February 2022, Chancellor Olaf Scholz argued before the German Parliament that the invasion "was a turning point in the continent's history." In order to prepare his country for this new reality, he immediately doubled Germany's defense budget from 47 billion euros to 100 billion. Several European Union (EU) members are planning the same thing. Finland, Sweden, the Netherlands and the UK have been first to declare their intent to beef up defense spending and more countries are expected to follow. The intent is to raise defense spending by NATO members to more than 2 percent of GDP.

 

And while the Ukraine War is serious enough to goose spending for planes, tanks, drone, rockets and such, the shooting war simply adds to a long list of mounting hostilities in an increasingly dangerous world. The threat of China and its ambitions to annex Taiwan, North Korean missiles, incessant warfare in the Middle East, rebel movements in Africa, and regular instances of cyberwarfare have kept defense spending high throughout the last several years, at least in the U.S.

 

The U.S. defense budget has been stable and rising given the quantity of perceived threats. As a result, the defense and aerospace sector have been quietly outperforming the market's returns for the past eight years or more. Thanks to the pandemic, and resulting supply chain issues last year, the industry experienced reduced production, but with the down swing in coronavirus cases (at least in the U.S.) production is getting back to normal. Most Wall Street analysts are expecting government defense expenditures to rise from about 2.8 percent to a range of 3.5-4 percent in the next few years.

 

From an investment point of view, the defense stocks move in cycles; roughly gaining for 7-8 years, underperforming for 2-3 years, and then growing again for another eight years or so. From 2020 to 2022, the industry underperformed, thus setting investors up for what could be a spate of outsized gains.

 

If we look back during the last 20 years of U.S. involvement in the Middle East, defense stocks such as L3Harris Technologies, Northrop, Lockheed Martin and Raytheon gained respectively 1,399 percent, 866 percent, 800 percent and 509 percent compared to the S&P 500 Index advance of 297 percent from 2001 to August 2021. I am not cherry-picking results either; most defense stocks have had similar returns.

 

Obviously, government spending is the largest customer of defense companies. At least 19 members of Congress (or their families) are personally invested in defense contractors, and some of them sit on congressional committees that regulate defense policies. I will avoid the obvious conflict of interest issues that this might raise and just remind readers that politicians on both sides of the aisle have good track records in investing in stocks that they can influence.

 

All indications are that the war in Ukraine is moving to another phase. Military experts expect the war will continue and may evolve into a protracted war of attrition. The China threat is not going away, and now that most western nations are rethinking their defense spending, it appears that we may be starting on a new multi-year cycle for defense stocks.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

Speculation is not quite rampant but it's getting there. Volume is tailing off and the short covering that has boosted this market higher is fizzling. These are signs that beg for a nice sharp pull back that is overdue.

 

As I have been suggesting (hoping) over the last two weeks, negotiators from Russia and Ukraine are making progress. Investors are beginning to hear more positive statements from both sides. A combination of factors are pressuring negotiators to cut a deal that would be acceptable to both heads of state. I expect that to happen soon.

 

Remember that we are now approaching planting season in the Ukraine. The spring thaw will also make mobility difficult for the invading forces. The Russian army seems to be pulling back in some areas but bolstering its forces in others. I suspect that has more to do with the Russians' strategic intent to capture and hold areas that contain Ukraine's most valuable energy resources.

 

The stock markets' "fear" trades have already begun to dissipate as evidenced by the slide in oil prices. The red-hot price rise in wheat and fertilize stocks are selling off, and gold is faltering as well. But notice that all this good news on the geopolitical front during the past week has not moved the overall averages up by much. That is a tell-tale sign to me that the good news may have already been discounted and it may be time to take some profits on some of the gains we have enjoyed recently.

 

Of course, the flattening of the yield curve, which inverted for a brief time on Tuesday and Thursday, March 29-31, had the bears jumping up and down. A flurry of bearish commentators lined up to solemnly predict the curve will invert further and a recession is right around the corner when it does. What is an inverted yield curve, you might ask, and why is it so important?

 

According to Investopedia, "An inverted yield curve occurs when short-term debt instruments have higher yields than long-term instruments of the same credit risk." An inversion is the first sign that the long-term growth prospects of the economy are in trouble and have preceded every U.S. recession in the past 50 years. Typically, a recession has followed in the two years after an inversion of this measure.

 

However, before you leap into the lifeboat, remember the same thing happened in August 2019. I warned readers at the time not to jump ship, because I believed the condition was temporary. It was, and I think this time around the same thing may happen. If, over time, all the short term, versus long-term, debt instruments — one month, three-month, one-year, two-year, five-year, versus 10-year, 20-and-30 year — were to invert, well then that would be a horse of a different color. We are not there yet.

 

But my optimism concerning the longer-term prospects of the economy doesn't necessarily translate into the short-term prospects for the stock market. I believe that the financial markets are still not out of the woods. This relief rally off the lows is a bear market bounce in my opinion. It has further to go, but a day or two of pullback next week would be helpful. Unless the S&P 500 Index closes between 4,400-4,500 today (Friday, April 1), I expect next week we will work off some more of this froth.

 

Sometime in late April or May, we may see a return to the bottom once again. Why do I believe that when the latest data show unemployment dropped to 3.6 percent? A combination of persistent inflation, a slowing economy, expected tepid corporate earnings, and an even more hawkish Fed will simply be too much for the markets to take on board.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

The red-hot housing markets is cooling off. A combination of higher interest rates and supply chain shortages are squeezing homebuyers. If these trends continue, the spring selling season may find buyers between a rock and a hard place.

 

The total value of the private residential real estate in the U.S. increased by a record $6.9 trillion to $43.4 trillion in 2021. Since the lows of the post-recession market, the value of housing has more than doubled. By this time in 2023, Zillow expects the typical U.S. home will be worth more than $400,000.

 

This year, demand for housing will remain tight and continuing to outstrip supply. But there are headwinds for homebuyers as well. One of the larger casualties of the Fed's intention to raise interest rates is the mortgage market.

 

Home mortgage interest rates have spiked over the last few months. At the beginning of 2022, the rate for qualified buyers was around 3 percent for 30-year fixed rate mortgages. Today, that same mortgage would cost 4.95 percent, according to Mortgage News Daily. During the past three weeks alone, according to Freddie Mac, we have seen the largest rise in mortgage interest rates since 1987.

 

In practical terms, a family that could manage $2,000 a month in mortgage payments could have afforded the purchase of $424,000 at the beginning of the month. This week, thanks to the rise in interest rates, the home they can afford dropped to $375,000. You might ask how rates could have backed up so much when the central bank has only raised interest rates by 25 basis points in March.

 

The answer is that the Fed focuses on the short end of the interest rate curve. Mortgage interest rates, however, are determined by the long end of the curve. A 20- or 30-year mortgage rate is based on what investors believe the Fed, the economy and inflation will be in the future. Given that inflation is expected to continue higher in the months ahead, and that the economy is expected to slow, lenders see more risk ahead for home buyers. Add in the Fed's stated intention to continue to raise interest rates several times this year (and maybe next year), there is no wonder that long-term interest rates for home mortgages are spiking higher.

 

For the last several years, demand for homes have outpaced supply. As such, home builders are having a hard time providing enough homes to the market. The present supply side problems besetting the construction industry, which were caused by the coronavirus pandemic, have just added insult to injury.

 

A huge shortage of materials is plaguing companies' ability to complete new homes. Lumber shortages have been well-publicized, but everything from siding, glass windows, large appliances and even garage doors have stretched delivery times from week to months. Those product shortages are acute and seem to be getting worse.

 

As mortgage rates continue to climb, it becomes harder for existing homeowners with low mortgage rates under 3 percent to sell and take on higher mortgage rates in order to buy a new home, which continues to cost more and more. This hesitancy further reduces the existing supply of housing stock available.

 

Home prices in the U.S. increased by 18.8 percent in 2021. That is considered an unsustainable level, but given the reduced level of inventory, most experts expect prices on homes to grow 16.4 percent or more in 2022. For homebuyers looking to purchase homes, the call seems to be do it sooner than later rather than later.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

Commodities continue to run. Interest rates are hitting new highs, and stocks are holding their gains from last week. Nothing has changed on the geopolitical front and all eyes are once again focused on the Fed and its next meeting in May. What else is new?

 

Stocks have been surprisingly resilient this week in the face of dire predictions that a recession is just around the corner. Many investors, and those who preach to them, are convinced that the Federal Reserve Bank is intent on hiking interest rates to a level where the economy will collapse as inflation continues to spike. One Citibank research team is now predicting 50-basis point increase in the Fed funds rate in May, June, July and September with a 25-basis point hike to follow. I am not in that camp.

 

You might remember back in December 2021, when I warned readers that Wall Street analysts would begin predicting a stagflation scenario sometime in the first quarter of 2022. Their conclusions are understandable, given the macroeconomic data, but I suggest that you take their predictions with a grain of salt.

 

Today, it is fashionable to say that the Fed has lost its credibility. Granted, their stance on inflation which they described as "transitory" proved to be wrong. I believe that global supply side shortages due to the coronavirus pandemic contributed to that miscalculation. It seems to me that estimating the extent of those shortages was, and still is, impossible for anyone to predict.

 

But that does not mean that the Fed is no longer creditable. Fed Chairman Jerome Powell and his FOMC members must thread the needle between raising interest rates to quell inflation, but not enough to hurt the economy. I don't envy their position, but I remain confident that they can do it, if anyone can. What I don't want to do is listen to forecasts from analysts with little or no experience in the areas of inflation and/or rising interest rates.

 

The war in Ukraine is now more than one month old. What Vladimir Putin believed would be a three-day war has resulted in a disaster of alleged war crimes, high casualties, and few Russian victories. The sanctions imposed by the West are beginning to bite and NATO is fast at work shoring up their defenses in Eastern Europe. It is a tinderbox looking for a match.

 

As such, headlines are still the main market movers with percentage point gains and losses commonplace. As I have written, if the VIX, the so-called fear gauge, continues to stay above 20 these big moves will continue. The good news is that VIX is now below 22 — down from more than 30 — two weeks ago.

 

I am keeping my fingers crossed, praying that a cease-fire could be in the offing soon. It appears that negotiations are progressing, although not as fast as most would like. Weather may play a part in bringing the two sides together. It is almost time for the sowing of wheat in Russia and Ukraine and without it, the world's population in many developing areas will suffer.

 

In addition, the change in weather will also bring a thawing of the land in Ukraine. Rivers will rise, rain will fall, and the frozen earth will turn to mud. It will become a nightmare of logistical problems for the Russian invaders as it did for the Germans in World War II. 

 

As for the stock market, given a 6 percent spike in almost as many days a week ago, a brief period of consolidation is to be expected for a day or two next week. If the S&P 500 Index can't get above the 4,530 area in the next day or two, I would expect the three main averages could give back some of their recent gains. That would be a dip to buy, because I still see the S&P 500 Index closer to 4,600 by the third week in April 2022.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

Oil prices are up 70 percent since last year. Prices at the pump were well over $4.25 a gallon recently. Everyone from President Biden on down is scrambling to find a way to reduce energy prices. Why, therefore, aren't we looking at our own domestic oil producers?

 

Unlike Saudi Arabia or the United Arab Emirates, which can increase the global oil supply with a flick of a switch, the shale energy community would need to increase spending in areas such as exploration, drilling and production. That is something they are not willing to do for a variety of reasons.

 

For years, shale drillers have been plagued by regulatory and environmental obstacles. Despite the court cases and lawsuits, shale companies forged ahead. Their stock prices soared as they spent more and more on speculative drilling and expansion. That era ended badly when oil prices collapsed in the early days of the coronavirus pandemic. A wave of bankruptcies swept through the shale industry and left the survivors chastened and extremely cautious.

 

The cowboy of yesterday has become the pinstriped borrower that Wall Street prefers. Rather than wild catting, company managements are buying back stock and instituting dividends.

 

That is not to say that oil production is at a standstill. The U.S. Energy Information Administration expects 2022 production will average 12 million barrels per day and 13 million barrels per day by 2023, which would be a record production year for U.S. producers.

 

The problem is that the same problems that are besetting the rest of the economy are plaguing energy producers as well. Supply chain constraints as well as the scarcity of labor are slowing even those companies willing to produce more. One simple example is the cost and scarcity of sand.

 

A cocktail of chemicals, water and sand are used in the fracturing of shale formations. The price of fracking sand has risen 185 percent during 2021 and now costs $45 per ton — if you can find it. If you throw in other key inputs like diesel fuel and steel, which are also rising in price the costs of drilling have exploded higher. At the same time, labor shortages not only at the well head but also in every link in the labor chain, from truck drivers to drillers, slow down production immensely.

 

Even if there was some policy change or other event that could galvanize another shale oil drilling boom, it would require six to nine months before that oil could reach the market. As such, the U.S. is joining the mad scramble for additional oil supplies. The U.S. is at a disadvantage thanks to President Biden's cool relationship with the heir-apparent to the Saudi Kingdom, Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Biden pledged to make Saudi Arabia a "pariah" due to the killing of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi in 2018.

 

At the same time, Saudi Arabia has changed their approach towards the U.S., especially under Biden. Russia's membership and importance in the OPEC-plus cartel has resulted in a neutral Saudi stance toward Russia's aggression in Ukraine. Qatar has agreed to work with Germany in increasing their supplies of liquefied natural gas. Japan is also negotiating with the UAE to increase oil supplies as has the U.K., but so far, they have received little satisfaction.

 

About the best the world can hope for is a cease-fire and a reduction in hostilities between Russia and Ukraine to at least dampen the rise in oil prices. I will stick my neck out and predict that we should see such an agreement by the end of the month.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.