Marchetti Proposes 8% Water/Sewer Increase

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council agenda on Tuesday includes water and sewer rates as well as a proposed change to the schedule and calculation for predictability and fair pricing. 

For fiscal year 2025, Mayor Peter Marchetti has proposed water and sewer rate hikes of 8 percent each. 

This would raise the average water bill for one toilet by about $24 per year, rising from $295.52 in FY24 to $322.44, and the average sewer bill by about $30, rising from $378.80 in FY24 to $409.12. The annual bill would total around $732.

Additional toilets would rise from about $149 in FY24 to about $161 for water and about $190 in FY24 to about $205 for sewer, totaling about $366 annually. Metered water would rise from $2.16 per cubic foot in FY24 to $2.33 for water and from $4.50 to $4.86 for sewer.

In FY24, water rates rose 12 percent and sewer rates 25 percent.

Marchetti submitted a draft ordinance to adjust the rates on an annual basis, explaining it is "is important for aligning our rates with the actual cost of providing these services, taking into account operational expenses, capital needs, contractual obligations and market goods and services variability."

The ordinance proposes a Rate Adjustment Formula based on the Consumer Price Index Factor (CPIF) and the Operational Stability Factor (OSF) in an attempt to fairly adjust rates, "ensuring our infrastructure can meet the city's needs while considering the impact on our residents."

The CPIF is a way to adjust for inflation or deflation and is calculated by comparing the year-over-year change in February of the CPI index for water and sewer, Marchetti explained, and the OSF aims at ensuring enough funding for future capital upgrades, maintenance, and unexpected challenges with a ten percent cap.

Currently, the city ordinance states that sewer and water charges are established from time to time by the commissioner of public services and utilities and adopted by the City Council. Rates are computed based on the total amount budgeted for sewer works operation and administration plus equipment replacement, capital improvements, depreciation, and projections of water use and wastewater discharge by system users and other necessary factors.

Rates are to be reviewed biennially to ensure they adequately recover these costs and conform with the established user charge requirements.

The proposed ordinance stipulates that rates are established by the commissioner and adjusted by the CPI for All Urban Consumers for Water and Sewer for the month of February, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics or its successor agency, plus an OSF.


If necessary, the OSF would be calculated and established by the commissioner or designee with approval by the City Council, considering the need to invest in infrastructure improvements, technology updates, and other capital projects. Notwithstanding the calculated OSF, it would not exceed ten percent.

Rising taxes and water/sewer bills have been a hot topic over the last few years, with many expressing concern for seniors who cannot afford their homes. Councilors have asked for citywide water meters as a part of this effort.

"The importance of this ordinance lies in its ability to provide predictability and stability in water and sewer rates for our residents and businesses. Predictable rates help households and companies plan their finances better, reducing the stress of unexpected increases. They also ensure our utility services can sustainably manage resources, addressing current and future needs without placing undue burden on our community," Marchetti wrote.

"This ordinance is key to the sustainable management of our water and sewer enterprises. It reflects our commitment to transparency, fairness, and responsiveness to the needs of our residents."

Also included in the agenda is a draft five-year agreement between the city and Casella Waste Management for solid waste and recyclables. Marchetti recommended that it be referred to the Committee of the Whole and reported that there would be three public meetings regarding it.

Casella purchased the former trash incinerator facility on Hubbard Avenue from Community Eco Power LLC, which filed for bankruptcy in 2021 and demolished it for redevelopment into a waste transfer station.

The agreement introduces a transition from manual to automated waste and recyclables using "specialized vehicles designed for fully automated curbside collection compatible with the provided 48-gallon carts for waste and recyclables."

If approved, automated collection services will launch in October.

"The proposed agreement includes savings in our budget with $80,000 less than our current allocation for waste management services and includes a commitment by Casella to make the capital investments necessary for the shift towards automated service, including the procurement and distribution of the standardized carts at no additional cost to the city, providing immediate fiscal benefits alongside the long-term savings expected from reduced waste processing fees. Importantly," the contract reads.

It also introduces a structured "pay as you throw" fee system for households requiring additional waste carts.


Tags: sewer rates,   water bills,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories