image description
Olivia Oberle wears a helmet during open mic at Pittsfield City Council on Tuesday to advocate for bike lanes

Charter Objection Puts the Brakes on Pittsfield Bike Lane Query

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Bike lanes incited a charter objection in the council chambers on Tuesday.

It is unclear what is happening with Councilor at Large Karen Kalinowsky's petition to put a question on the Nov. 7 ballot that, if approved, returns North Street to four lanes of traffic and remove the bike lanes.

Kalinowsky says a vote taken last month secured it on the ballot but her colleagues are unsure if that is true.  

It was brought back to the City Council on Tuesday after being referred to City Solicitor Stephen Pagnotta. After some debate over semantics, Councilor at Large Earl Persip III put the conversation to a screeching halt with a charter objection.

"If we want to start putting things on the ballot that social media dislikes we might as well become a town and do a town meeting at that point," he said.

Persip, who was absent for the vote at the last City Council meeting, does not agree with Kalinowsky's proposal and believes that North Street is safer with one lane of traffic — even if the current design is not perfect.

"There is no question about whether to place it on the ballot or not," Kalinowsky said. "The question is going on the ballot. It passed."

The petition had been supported 5-4 and referred to the city solicitor after the language was amended.  Since the vote, councilors and city officials have been unsure about what it means.

"Two weeks ago we got ourselves in that problem," President Peter Marchetti said, adding there was language about putting it on the ballot but what was approved was not a legal ballot form.

Pagnotta said the answer lies in the minutes prepared by City Clerk Michele Benjamin, which can be debated. City meetings are also recorded by Pittsfield Community Television.

Based on the draft minutes, he did not recall seeing a specific motion to place it on the ballot.

Pagnotta's communication in the council materials states that on Jan. 24, an amended petition from Kalinowsky requesting that the City Council place a, question on the Nov. 7, 2023 ballot to remove the existing bike lanes on North Street from Park Square to Wahconah Street was referred to his office.

He drafted a question that reads:

"Shall the following measure take effect? Shall the Department of Public Services, no later than May 1, 2024, return North Street to four (4) lanes of traffic with turn lanes.


"A YES vote will require the City of Pittsfield to remove the existing protected bike lanes from North
Street.

"A NO vote will allow the protected bike lanes to remain on North Street."

Because of the confusion, a petition from Rebecca Brien of Downtown Pittsfield Inc. requesting to change parking on North Street to head-in diagonal was tabled. 

A number of people showed up to support the bike lanes during the open microphone.

Elementary school teacher Olivia Oberle and her father, Randolph Oberle, regularly ride their bikes around the city from East New Lenox Road. He avoided riding on North Street before the bike lanes.

"As a father of a bicyclist who, when we are done here is going to ride to East New Lenox Road, I am terrified every time she gets on her bicycle in the city of Pittsfield. Every time," he said.

"Every day she rides from East New Lenox to Morningside Community School and back. Light, dark, winter, summer, it doesn't matter. It's terrible and I'd like to see traffic slowed down. I'd like to see it slow down everywhere."

Barbara Mahony said she drives slower on North Street since the reconfiguration and has no problem navigating the corridor or parking.

"I usually do not talk about my age but since I had a significant birthday in January, I think it's pertinent to this issue," she said.

"If a 90-year-old woman can easily drive on North Street and this new design benefits cyclists and slows down traffic on North Street, then why all this controversy?"

Nicholas Russo recognized that the design is far from perfect but said there is "so much potential" and more work to be done. He performed contract work on the first iteration of bike lanes in 2021 and is leading a community design effort that is unaffiliated with the city.

"I do have an issue with the notion that North Street is only for cars and bicycles should be shunted to the sidewalk or to the nature trail. We've had two pedestrian deaths take place in the span of a month on roads that were designed with this notion in mind," Russo said.

"North Street, our main street, is a fundamental platform for all ages, abilities, incomes, and backgrounds to participate in civic life. There needs to be an expectation of commingling and some messiness along the way. I do not believe that deciding who is welcome to our main street should be left up to a popular referendum."


Tags: bike lane,   North Street,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Officials Take Road District Dissolution Off Warrant

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board has removed a town meeting warrant article regarding the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District.

JMJ Holdings development consultant Tim Grogan spoke in public comment saying the Berkshire Mall owner is currently has purchase-and-sale agreement for the mall. 

Back in February, the Select Board settled a tax dispute with JMJ Holdings by agreeing to move forward in dissolving the district if the company paid $1.1 million to the town. JMJ Holdings had to provide a signed development-and-purchase agreement 30 days before the town meeting. 

JMJ holdings did not submit a payment to be made by May 9. Because of that, the Select Board voted to take the article of the warrant to be voted at the annual town meeting.

Meanwhile, the Baker Hill Road District presented a slideshow defending the district and explaining what it does.

The district currently provides a non-resident-funded revenue stream of around $500,000 per year. These funds help pay for police cars and officer salaries, dump trucks, fire trucks, and more for the town.

"Dissolution would mean the district's three commercial property owners would no longer have to pay for upkeep of the Route Seven/Eight connector road. As a result, the BHRD annual contribution of more than $500,000 to Lanesborough would disappear permanently, since the services and maintenance costs associated with the Route Seven and Eight connector road would still remain," said Tom Caraccioli, PR consultant with AH&M Inc. "Lanesborough would have to absorb these costs and continue to provide emergency services to the mall and Target. The financial burden for these remaining expenses would then fall on Lanesborough taxpayers through higher taxes or the reduction of other important town services."

The proposal with JMJ would affect the town in a negative way Caraccioli claimed. 

"JMJ is proposing a one-time payment of $1.1 million to Lanesborough in exchange, JMJ would never pay BHRD taxes again. The decision to dissolve the BHRD by accepting this proposed $1.1 million would be a permanent choice that would have irreversible consequences," he said. "There will be no official system in place to cover recurring costs once the money from this single payment is spent. Therefore, the proposed one-time payment is not a long-term solution for the town of Lanesborough."

JMJ's dispute was that the Berkshire Mall no longer exists as a functioning entity and it should not be on the hook for protection and maintenance that had been based on the mall's operation in its heyday. The company is seeking to redevelop the site as senior housing and town officials were asking the state to take over the Connector Road. 

District officials said it's not guaranteed that the state would take over the road linking Routes 7 and 8, built to service the mall back in the '80s, and that the state Department of Transportation had historically discouraged the town from asking. Even if it happened, it could take three to five years, during which no BHRD funds would be collected if the district is dissolved. The state would not replace the revenue they support, and they argued the state is facing its own budget issues making it unlikely they would want to take over.

The road district was created by an act of the Legislature and would require another act to dissolve it. The town meeting article asked for voter support for a home-rule petition to start that process.  

After the presentation, it was asked what the current financial status of the BHRD, given that JMJ hasn’t paid in a long time and if the district actually has the money or if it is dependent on the mall sale.

Mark Siegars, attorney for BHRD, reminded the room that the mall is under a purchase and sale agreement and if the sale closes, the district expects to receive more than a million dollars because of the lawsuit and lien, but does not have that cash yet. If the sale does not go through, BHRD will take the mall and sell it. The district still gets payments from Target, which is separate from the mall. 

There were also some questions on the district's history, with Select Board member Jason Breault asking if the mall did not have a high tax rate from the district, would it still be solvent. The exchange became heated between Siegars and BHRD Chair Bill Prendergast.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories