image description
The condition of Notre Dame's supporting buttresses is considered 'dangerous' by engineers.

North Adams Seeks Emergency Preservation Funds for Notre Dame

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Three buttresses will be to partially demolished and rebuilt.

NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — The city is asking the state for emergency funding to help address the "dangerous condition" of Notre Dame Church.

It will take an estimated $200,000 to repair the brick buttresses that began failing this past winter when water infiltration and freezing began to eat away at the mortar, particularly in the southwest and southeast corners of the vacant building. Loose bricks were removed on the southwest corner by city workers and the parking area behind the East Main Street church were blocked off for safety.
 
The city is asking Secretary of State William F. Galvin, who oversees historic preservation matters, for $50,000 in emergency preservation funding to be matched by $50,000 from the city.The total estimate by Barry Engineers and Constructors Inc. comes to $211,770. Mayor Richard Alcombright on Tuesday told the City Council he anticipated requesting a transfer from the stabilization account for the repairs.

His plan is to use any emergency funds and the city match totaling $100,000 to fix the water collection system ($14,270) and the balance toward as much of the brickwork as can be restored. The city would apply for another round of preservation funding later in the year to complete the restoration.

Massachusetts Preservation Projects Fund are available at the "secretary's discretion for stabilization of resources considered in imminent danger."

In his letter to Galvin, the mayor notes the city has already lost the historic St. Francis of Assissi Church to the wrecking ball because of "catastrophic structural failure."

"... the Notre Dame Church has been vacant now for well over 15 yearse and is beginning to show its age," he said. "The attached reports and photos from Barry Engineers and Constructors Inc. shows a significant need for brickwork that will allow us to keep the building 'in play' for future development."

City officials had not considered the church as in as a dire a strait as St. Francis, but Barry Engineers and Constructors Inc. in its report said the "building structure must be repaired immediately to avoid partial or a major building collapse."

The engineers are concerned that service loads such as "gravity, wind, snow and seismic" will put undue pressure on the weakened buttresses.

"Repairs must be completed prior to the winter season to avoid snow loads and continued water entry and freeze and thaw conditions," the report states.

The water issues were the result of the vandalizing and theft of the roof gutter that allowed water to pour down on the brick masonry. The engineering report focused on the affected areas and not other parts of the church, including the steeple, and was limited to visible observation.

There is no indication of water infiltration in the interior; but buttress 11, in the rear, has fully collapsed and buttress 10 is near collapse. An interior staircase at buttress 11 shows a wall crack. Both buttresses will require complete restoration. A third buttress also needs significant repair and five others moderate repair to minor repointing. The brownstone caps also need repointing and the one over the front door to be reset.



Barry also recommends checking all masonry joints for repointing and repairing and replacing the gutter system. The estimates are $197,500 for the masonry and $14,270 for the gutters.

The report warns that "additional work might be discovered and the probably estimates of construction costs could be more or less than the estimate."

Alcombright has previously stated he would like the city to divest some of its real estate. The 140-year-old church, closed in 2005, was purchased by the city in 2007 largely to save the steeple. Its rectory was sold but there is still a large school on the property.

The mayor indicated that repairing the building will be critical to its reuse.

"I have had the building appraised and will be issuing an RFP to see if we can find an investor with an 'appropriate' plan that will put the building to good use while preserving its envelope to include its massive and beautiful steeple," he wrote to Galvin.


Tags: church,   historic buildings,   historic preservation,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

North Adams Takes Possession of Historic Church Street Houses

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff

The porch collapsed on 116 Church several years ago. 
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — The state Land Court in February finalized the city's tax taking of four properties including the brick Church Street mansions.
 
The prestigious pair of Queen Anne mansions had been owned by Franklin E. Perras Jr., who died in 2017 at age 79. 
 
The properties had been in court for four years as attempts were made repeatedly to find Perras' heirs, including a son, Christopher. According to court filings, Christopher reportedly died in 2013 but his place of death is unknown, as is the location (or existence) of two grandchildren listed in Perras' obituary. 
 
Mayor Jennifer Macksey said the next steps will be to develop requests for proposals for the properties to sell them off. 
 
She credited Governor's Councillor Tara Jacobs for bringing the lingering tax takings to the Land Court's attention. Jacobs said she'd asked about the status of the properties and a few days later they were signed off. 
 
It wasn't just the four North Adams properties — the cases for three Perras holdings in Lanesborough that also had been in the court for years were closed, including Keeler Island. Another property on Holmes Road in Hinsdale is still in the court.  
 
The buildings at 116, 124 and 130 Church St., and a vacant lot on Arnold Place had been in tax title since 2017 when the city placed $12,000 in liens. 
 
View Full Story

More North Adams Stories