Early Closing Restrictions Lifted for Pittsfield Bar

By Joe DurwinPittsfield Correspondent
Print Story | Email Story
The Licensing Board cautiously voted to lift the early closing time for Johnny's Beach Club.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city's Licensing Board has voted 3-1 to lift sanctions for a Wahconah Street nightclub imposed after a mass disturbance that occurred there in March.

Johnny's Beach Club, formerly long known as Pepe's, will be allowed to resume a closing time of 2 a.m. despite some level of wariness expressed by members of the board on Monday.
 
The board voted to allow the resumed early-morning closing following testimony from Sgt. Michael Grady, who said owner John Giardina had cooperated with Pittsfield Police to implement recommended changes and had been in good standing since resuming business after a seven-day suspension earlier this year.
 
"Everything we've requested he's complied with and we haven't had any issues since," said Grady, who noted that the department had responded to "five or six" calls for the bar since the suspension, but none in which the tavern was judged responsible for any negligence.
 
Improvements were attributed to the increased presence of owner and manager Giardina at the establishment.
 
"Clearly when the owner is present there are fewer, if any, altercations," said Chairman Carmen C. Massimiano Jr.
 
Massimiano suggested that the board should acknowledge the improvements made by Giardina, but defended the severity of the board's censure.   
 
"That was a melee that went on, those were riotous conditions," Massimiano told Giardina of the March incident. "I think what we did was right."
 
"It's all about overserving, that's what it stems from," agreed board member Thomas Campoli.
 
"I feel like you're singling me out," Giardina told the board, saying the few times he'd been punished was not a large percentage given "three or four thousand" patrons served over his 20 years in business at that address.
 
"The dynamics of the city have changed," said Giardina, who expressed the opinion that overserving has not been the issue. "I will have to be a lot more vigilant."
 
"It's not the few bad people that caused a problem that night, it's the culture of what has been allowed to happen for years," said board member Dana Doyle.
 
"It just couldn't have turned into that explosive event if there wasn't overserving," agreed Massimiano.
 
"It's just the compiled history of your place that makes me hesitant," said Robert Quattrochi, who voted to oppose lifting the time restriction.
 
"The reality is that what happened in March was unprecedented. Obviously we have taken that very seriously," said Campoli, who motioned to allow the resumption of 2 a.m. closing, but said the board would be "tuned in closely" to what is happening at the establishment.

Tags: alochol licenses,   license board,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Council to See 10-Year Charter Review Report

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Following almost two years of work, the Charter Review Committee has made its recommendations to the City Council.

Tuesday's council agenda includes the committee's report dealing with governance items such as the charter objection, term limits, and financial procedures. Every 10 years, a panel reviews the City Charter, which defines the city's structure of government.

"The Charter Review Committee was established by city ordinance in May 2023. Its first meeting took place on August 7, 2023, under the direction of City Solicitor Stephen Pagnotta," Chair Michael McCarthy's executive summary reads.

"Solicitor Pagnotta informed the committee that its mission is to offer recommendations to city government concerning the Charter."

The charter objection was the most discussed issue throughout the preview process.  Members determined "the City's interest in a functioning government is not served well by a Charter' Objection being made by a sole Councilor."

The nearly 50-page report proposes amendments to Article 2 Section 9C, Charter Objection, to allow for discussion, require three supporters, and be prohibited when it pertains to the proposed budget for the upcoming fiscal year.

"The Committee felt strongly that the budgetary process should not be held hostage to a Charter Objection. The process of approving a budget under the Charter involves months of hearings with firm calendar restrictions, leading to a budget that must be in place before each fiscal year begins," McCarthy wrote.

"A Charter Objection during this process would have the potential to disrupt and delay the budget being in place on July 1 of each fiscal year."

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories