BRPC Chugging Along With Railroad Station Study

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
The full commission was briefed on the project on Thursday.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — County planners are looking to conclude a study of possible passenger train stations by September.

Berkshire Regional Planning Commission is in the middle of determining locations for train stations from Pittsfield to the Connecticut border. The state is looking to re-establish a passenger rail line to New York City.

Planner Brian Domina outlined the progress and process Thursday saying the ultimate goal is to identify the number and locations of stations, complete with drawings rendering what amenities would be at the stations.

Domina said the study has begun with just identifying areas of land with 500 feet of the rail line and then eliminating sites that cannot be developed.

"We have 1,885 acres of developable land within the stretch," he said, adding that 2,500 acres had been eliminated.

The parcels eliminated had steep slopes, protected open space, lack of access to the rail or wetlands issues.

From there, the study looked at five environmental issues: wetlands, the 100-year floodplain, habitat for endangered species, areas of critical environmental concern and Housatonic River watershed priority lands. A total of 842 acres did not have any of those restrictions and 16 acres had all of those.


The next step is to looking at siting to see if each town were to have a station, where it should be located. Planners are looking at economic impacts, access, conformity with community planning efforts, community character, operational constants and environmental impacts. For example, in Pittsfield, they looked at four areas for a possible station and scored them yes or no on such questions as their proximity to retail, highways and cultural attractions.

In this step, the organization will be meeting with town officials and residents to hear their concerns and ideas to find the best spots in each one.

"We want to be on the same page with the communities with what we are recommending," Domina said.

After that, they'll be trying to determine how many stations there should be and ranking the locations. In that phase, he will be looking at impacts like traffic, economics and property values.

Meanwhile, Housatonic Railroad, which owns the tracks, is refining its ridership forecast and identifying track improvement needs. Domina said the tracks will need a "soup to nuts" renovation because they were mostly built in the 1920s.

Finally, all of that work will be put together for recommendations of design, ownership of the station options and sketches and narratives of preliminary site plans.

Working meetings with the communities along the rail line, with six more to go, should be completed in February. There will be two subregional public information meetings and, in August, Domina expects to release a draft plan. The final report is due in September.

Planners did have to stop the research for about a month after the state placed a stop-work order. Several community working meetings had to be canceled and are now being rescheduled. The stop-work order has since been lifted.

The study is being paid for with a $240,000 federal grant and Housatonic Railroad is contributing $60,000 of in-kind work.


Tags: passenger rail,   rail station,   railroad,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: An Honor to Serve

By Smitty PignatelliGuest Column
As I reflect on the past 22 years serving as a member of the Massachusetts House of Representatives, I do so with immense pride and gratitude. Together with my colleagues, I have had the privilege of contributing to landmark legislation that has defined our commonwealth, from marriage equality to health care for all — both of which became national models. 
 
I've worked on major environmental, economic development, and housing bond bills that continue to benefit the Berkshires and will for years to come.
 
Of course, none of this was accomplished single-handedly. The legislative process is a team effort, and I have been fortunate to serve alongside dedicated colleagues who have always put the interests of Massachusetts first. When I first entered the House, I thought I knew a lot, having spent years in local and county government. But I quickly realized I had much more to learn. I was lucky to have the guidance and support of Reps. Peter Larkin, Dan Bosley and the entire Berkshire delegation, who took me under their wing and set me on the right path. I was proud to team up with them 20 years ago to create the first in the nation Cultural Facilities Fund that has delivered hundreds of millions of dollars to our local economy. 
 
Throughout my tenure, we've faced the ups and downs of local, state, and global economies. Yet I've always believed that when we work together, no challenge is insurmountable. The 22 communities I have represented over the years have demonstrated time and again the power of collaboration to make the Berkshires — and what I like to call "BesternMass" — a thriving, vibrant region.
 
The State House is steeped in tradition, with its formal titles and protocols: "Representative this" or "Chairperson that." But I've always reminded my team that while my job may be important, I never felt important. I entered the House as Smitty, and I'm proud to leave it the same way — simply Smitty.
 
Growing up, politics in my household was never a dirty word, and politicians were not seen as bad people. Those early lessons grounded me in the belief that public service is about representing the needs of others, not yourself. I've carried that belief with me every day in the House, never forgetting where I came from or the people I was there to serve. Representing the 4th (now 3rd) Berkshire District — my home — has been the greatest honor of my life. I wasn't always successful, but I gave my best every single day. After nearly 50 years in public service, I retire as a public servant, not a politician.
 
One of my greatest concerns is that public office today risks becoming more about "self-service" than "public service." We need people at all levels to stay engaged, hold public officials accountable, and demand better. I've always set a high bar for myself and those around me. I've never been afraid to admit failure or celebrate shared success, and I've tried each day to lead with the same passion, vision, and integrity my family instilled in me.
 
View Full Story

More South Berkshire Stories