Lanesborough OKs Dollar General Proposal

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
Kevin Hixson, a project manager with BL Cos. representing Primax, presents the most recent plans.

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Dollar General has received a special permit to build a store on Route 7.

On Monday, the Planning Board approved both amending a 2004 special permit for Liam Shirley to operate self-storage units and a new special permit for Primax Properties LLC to build the Dollar General.

The initial special permit needed to be amended to allow the storage company to operate on less land.

The parcel has the former Party Barn, which will be demolished to make way for the dollar store. Shirley operates the storage sheds and will sell the area in front to Primax as well as a sliver of land behind the storage units — a total of the required two acres.

The storage units will share a boundary with the post office lot, which Shirley also owns, and under common ownership he, too, would have sufficient acreage.

The proposal has gone through multiple changes since first being introduced. The board asked the company to change the building's facade, which architects did, and do a second traffic study.

But still, the board said there wasn't enough frontage nor enough acreage to support the new store and Primax went back to the drawing board and carved out the additional pieces to satisfy the space needs.

From there, the town asked for more parking spots, more facade changes, realignment of the property line to be "squared off" and to submit another plan outlining how the acreage and frontage would be addressed.


The company now has sufficient frontage on both an old stagecoach road and on Route 7. It will need to submit another form for the land to be divided.

Town Counsel Gary Brackett talked the board through the five required findings for a special permit to be issued, all of which the board agreed were met. The proposal is in harmony with the general use of the zone, desirable to the public at that location, is not detrimental to adjacent uses, does not create too much traffic and does not overload any public water, sewer or drainage system.

The proposal wasn't without public opposition. For two nights of public hearing, residents crowded Town Hall voicing concerns.

Attorney Jeff Lynch, representing nearby resident and business owner Rocky Vyas, argued Monday that the public had not had enough time to see the plans. He said he has had trouble getting updated plans prior to the public hearing including never seeing the original applications. He urged the board to deny the permit on the grounds that the public had not had adequate documentation to review.

Brackett, however, said that since there was sufficient public participating in the public hearing itself, the public documentation requests should not be considered in rendering a decision.


Tags: dollar store,   Planning Board,   special permit,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Council to See 10-Year Charter Review Report

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Following almost two years of work, the Charter Review Committee has made its recommendations to the City Council.

Tuesday's council agenda includes the committee's report dealing with governance items such as the charter objection, term limits, and financial procedures. Every 10 years, a panel reviews the City Charter, which defines the city's structure of government.

"The Charter Review Committee was established by city ordinance in May 2023. Its first meeting took place on August 7, 2023, under the direction of City Solicitor Stephen Pagnotta," Chair Michael McCarthy's executive summary reads.

"Solicitor Pagnotta informed the committee that its mission is to offer recommendations to city government concerning the Charter."

The charter objection was the most discussed issue throughout the preview process.  Members determined "the City's interest in a functioning government is not served well by a Charter' Objection being made by a sole Councilor."

The nearly 50-page report proposes amendments to Article 2 Section 9C, Charter Objection, to allow for discussion, require three supporters, and be prohibited when it pertains to the proposed budget for the upcoming fiscal year.

"The Committee felt strongly that the budgetary process should not be held hostage to a Charter Objection. The process of approving a budget under the Charter involves months of hearings with firm calendar restrictions, leading to a budget that must be in place before each fiscal year begins," McCarthy wrote.

"A Charter Objection during this process would have the potential to disrupt and delay the budget being in place on July 1 of each fiscal year."

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories