Letters: Just Do the Math

Letters to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

The controversy over the removal of conservation land for the purpose of development of affordable housing in Williamstown continues to ratchet up.

Many letters have raised the question of at what cost. Equally as important as being good stewards of conservation land it is likewise as important to be good stewards of those monies that will allow Williamstown to provide the greatest number of affordable, fiscally responsible and ecologically sensible housing to those in need.

The development and infrastructure costs of the conceptual plan to create 41 building lots on the Lowry property would approximate a $45,000 to $50,000 land cost per unit before any vertical construction of housing. That is an infrastructure cost alone approaching $2,000,000.The other vacant town sites, Photech and 59 Water St., along with a third privately owned vacant site referenced to as Cable Mills South, would only require development and infrastructure costs approximating $10,000 to $15,000 land cost per unit before any vertical construction.  


That represents an opportunity to create affordable housing in Williamstown at a ratio of 3 to 1 on these alternative sites. Not to mention the economies of scale in the construction of mixed-use housing as opposed to single family dwellings that will not provide the same long term economies of maintenance, upkeep and energy efficiency. With 35 years of career experience in the acquisition, development and marketing of real estate, including affordable-housing site selection and more specifically land development in no less than 25 different states, myself along with most anyone who has developed property would tell you that those numbers just don't work to the favor of developing the Lowry property when considering other alternatives.

Putting aside all of the controversies spinning around the issues of affordable housing and conservation land, I ask town officials and the public at large, "just do the math."
 

Robert J. Scerbo
Williamstown
April 13, 2013


Tags: affordable housing,   conserved land,   lowry property,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Vice Chair Vote Highlights Fissure on Williamstown Select Board

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — A seemingly mundane decision about deciding on a board officer devolved into a critique of one member's service at Monday's Select Board meeting.
 
The recent departure of Andrew Hogeland left vacant the position of vice chair on the five-person board. On Monday, the board spent a second meeting discussing whether and how to fill that seat for the remainder of its 2024-25 term.
 
Ultimately, the board voted, 3-1-1, to install Stephanie Boyd in that position, a decision that came after a lengthy conversation and a 2-2-1 vote against assigning the role to a different member of the panel.
 
Chair Jane Patton nominated Jeffrey Johnson for vice chair after explaining her reasons not to support Boyd, who had expressed interest in serving.
 
Patton said members in leadership roles need to demonstrate they are "part of the team" and gave reasons why Boyd does not fit that bill.
 
Patton pointed to Boyd's statement at a June 5 meeting that she did not want to serve on the Diversity, Inclusion and Racial Equity Committee, instead choosing to focus on work in which she already is heavily engaged on the Carbon Dioxide Lowering (COOL) Committee.
 
"We've talked, Jeff [Johnson] and I, about how critical we think it is for a Select Board member to participate in other town committees," Patton said on Monday. "I know you participate with the COOL Committee, but, especially DIRE, you weren't interested in that."
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories