Pittsfield Board Won't Back Dunkin' Donuts Plan

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

James Scalise presented the plans to the Community Development Board on Tuesday. Cafua will now go in front of the City Council to seek approval.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Community Development Board will not support a proposed Dunkin' Donuts drive-through on Fenn Street.

Cafua Management Co. was denied a positive recommendation from the board on Tuesday after presenting a site plan.

Engineer James Scalise of SK Design presented the plans to tear down the former Plunkett School and replace it with a Dunkin' Donuts franchise and retail space.

However, board members were concerned with traffic and how a drive-through would fit into the city's master plan, which calls for a "walkable" downtown and preservation of historic buildings.

The vote was 3-1 in favor of providing no recommendation — member Alf Barbalunga abstained and member David Hathaway recused himself prior to the discussion.

"I think there is nothing I'd like to see less than a drive-through at that corner," said board member Judith Katz, who was the lone vote against having "no recommendation" because she instead wanted to recommend with strict conditions.

Cafua will now have to go in front of the City Council in hopes to get approval for a special permit. The council can vote in favor of giving the company the special permit without a positive recommendation from the Community Development Board.

Traffic was the biggest concern, but Scalise said two studies and an analysis dating since April 2012 have shown there would be little impact. The drive-through would allow for a backup of 13 vehicles on the property — well above the typical six cars, he said. The business expects to bring a peak of 129 more cars to the area each day.

Other Dunkin' Donuts in the city have backups of 10 cars at their max, Scalise said, and being a new store, waiting times for orders would be decreased thus moving cars in and out quicker.

"We believe this project will lead to an improvement of traffic conditions," he told the board, citing that a loading dock that currently forces tractor-trailers to poke out onto Fenn Street would be eliminated and that drivers will be able to see the intersection and traffic lights better.
 

Related stories:

Former Pittsfield School Fate Still Uncertain

Board Upholds Demoliton Delay for Old Plunkett School

The proposed project would replace the already operating First Street Dunkin' Donuts, which had a long history of causing traffic complaints. That situation cannot be considered by the board when rendering a decision on this proposal though.

While picking through the study, board members felt that a drive-through on Fenn would cause too much congestion at an already busy intersection.

Board member Floriana Fitzgerald pointed to wait times of just short of 30 seconds to take a left in some occasions and worried that drivers would get impatient and thus cause delays.



"I am concerned about the real-life situation of an individual sitting in the car waiting to get out," she said, asking how long would it take for a driver to just drive out and force his or her way into the driving lane.

But Traffic Engineer Paul Furgal said the wait times are consistent with similar projects. Scalise added that both the Fire Department and city engineer have reviewed the plans and had no concerns. The plan would utilize existing curb cuts.

Other than traffic, Scalise said the plan improves water run off by creating more green space — thus reducing impervious surfaces — will feature lighting and sign work consistent with the landscape of the newly renovated Common, would tie water and wastewater into the city's infrastructure but with "significantly" less usage than the current building and would confine trash removal a fenced-in rear corner.

Greg Nolan, of Cafua, said the company has its own landscaping and snow removal contracts so the site would be well maintained.

Overall, the plan would "extend the use of the Common" because pedestrians would walk down to the retail shop and restaurant, the proponents said.

"It is a dead zone now," Scalise said.

Board member Sheila Irvin, however, noted that the city's master plan calls for a de-emphasis on "auto-centric" developments. "This is part of our downtown and our master plan calls for walkability and less vehicles," she said.

Attorney Thomas Hamel, representing Cafua, however, contended that the Fenn Street site is on a major thoroughfare and outside of the downtown "neighborhoods."

Additionally, attorney David Rich, also representing Cafua, said the board members shouldn't be considering the historic aspect of  because that is handled by another committee. Board member Louis Costi responded that the city has lost so many historic building that they have, too.

The Historic Commission has twice delayed demolition permits citing the building's 103-year history.


Tags: demolition,   drive-through,   Dunkin Donuts,   fast-food,   historical building,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories