'Save the Spruces' Group Dominates Conservation Meeting

By Stephen DravisWilliamstown Correspondent
Print Story | Email Story

Some 150 people attended what was billed as an informational meeting on maintaining conserved land but 'Saving the Spruces' dominated the talk.

WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Spruces Mobile Home Park residents who do not want to relocate turned out in force Wednesday night at a meeting organized by conservationists looking to save the property being eyed for that relocation.

The newly formed Friends of Williamstown Conservation Lands called the meeting in the ballroom of the Orchards to discuss ways to stop a plan to remove the 30-acre Lowry property from conservation and use it to build affordable housing.

The conservation group founded by former selectman Kenneth Swiatek found some friends in a group of very vocal, angry Spruces residents who expressed frustration with the town's plan to apply for FEMA grant money to buy the storm-damaged mobile home park and build housing on the conserved land off Stratton Road.

"We want to remain in the Spruces," resident Linda Bell said before a meeting of about 150 attendees from both camps. "[Town Manager Peter] Fohlin promised we would stay there after the flood. And now we're being thrown out."

The flood in question is last year's Tropical Storm Irene, which destroyed 153 homes in the park, adding to an existing deficit of affordable housing in the town.

Sixty-seven homes remain occupied at the Spruces, and on Tuesday, a group of 10 of those residents came together to form the Save the Spruces committee, according to that group's spokesman, Peter Russell, who attended Wednesday's meeting.

Although Swiatek opened the meeting with general discussions about the benefits of conserved land and the process for taking land out of conservation, as soon as the conversation turned to the specifics of the town's plan to buy the Spruces (and put its 114 acres in conservation), the park's residents dominated the conversation.

"We're human beings," Russell said during the meeting. "I live in the Spruces. I don't want my home taken away. I want you people to come together and help us save the Spruces."

Another resident from Russell's group told the meeting that many of the Spruces residents had spent their own money to fix their homes after the flood, and they feel that promises have been broken by the town.

"We were assured by the same Mr. Fohlin and the same Morgan Management that they would keep the park open," the Rev. Sue Stewart said, referring to the owner of the mobile home park, which has a purchase agreement with the town contingent on the federal grant money. "That's why you're hearing anger."

Neither Fohlin nor any members of the Board of Selectmen attended Wednesday's meeting. Members of at least two town committees were in attendance, and both Sarah Gardner, who serves on the Conservation Commission, and Beth Phelps, who chairs the Agricultural Commission, encouraged Spruces residents angered by the plan to attend relevant town committee meetings, including those of the Selectmen, which meets the second and fourth Monday of each month at 7 p.m.

"If you're interested in conservation land, go to the Conservation Commission, if you're interested in agricultural land, go to the Ag Commission, if you're interested in affordable housing, go to the Affordable Housing Committee," Gardner said. "I feel like a written statement from the residents would be helpful."
 

Created as a retirement community, the Spruces contained much of the town's affordable housing until Irene struck. The park, most of which lies in a floodplain, had been plagued by water even before the tropical storm hit.

Fohlin and members of the Selectmen met privately with Spruces residents before announcing the plan to swap the conserved land and build new affordable housing at a Nov. 13 Selectmen's meeting. At the public meeting later that evening, Fohlin characterized the meeting with the residents as emotional but declined to speculate about what was in their heads.



On Wednesday, Russell said the residents were respectful at the meeting and are now ready to make their objections public.

Bell agreed.

"We were so shocked we couldn't ask questions," she said of the Nov. 13 meeting. "now we're fighting back. We are asking questions."

Russell said Fohlin has told residents he will meet with them again in December.

The town manager was defended at the meeting by Robin Lenz, the former director of Higher Ground, the interfaith non-profit that was formed in the aftermath of Irene largely to address the needs of Spruces residents displaced by the storm.

"My experience the last 13 months is that the town has it's heart in the right place," Lenz said. "The town could have walked away. It could have said, 'We don't have to find houses for folks. We could let floods happen routinely.' My understanding is that Morgan Management cannot operate [the park].

"That Peter Fohlin has been working, in my opinion, night and day to find options for residents of the Spruces speaks volumes about his character."

Lenz did later say she agreed wholeheartedly with the sentiment that the town should be looking first to develop "brownfields" like the former town garage site, the former Photech mill and the Cable Mills complex on Water Street before acting to take land out of conservation.

Swiatek said the Lowry property has unique beauty and provides habitat for wildlife as well as opportunities for recreation. The Friends of Williamstown Conservation Lands plans weekly hikes on the property each Sunday in December, he said.

"If you're going to propose affordable housing, don't put it on conserved land," he said. "Why? Because it's conserved land.

"I think conservation is an important thing and shouldn't be taken lightly. Open space is pretty rare."


Tags: affordable housing,   conserved land,   Irene,   Spruces,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories