Spruces Residents Worried About Their Unknown Future

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Many residents attended Tuesday's Affordable Housing Committee meeting to ask questions about the proposed project.

WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Displaced Spruces resident Donna Bishop is in the middle of repairing her home to either sell or move back in. But now with the town's grant application to demolish the park, she's "stuck."

"I cannot sell my place due to what they're doing," Bishop told the Affordable Housing Committee on Tuesday night. "I'm overwhelmed. I don't know what to do."

Like many Spruces Mobile Home Park residents, she's had to deal with the flooding and destruction caused by last year's Hurricane Irene.

Bishop has fought through the court to get electricity back on in her home and began making the needed repairs to get the rest of the utilities. She has spent hours working with the Federal Emergency Management Agency and had scheduled an appointment to have TechnoPosts installed, which she has since canceled.

"I really want to go back," Bishop said.

She isn't the only resident worried about the proposal announced two weeks ago to demolish the park and build affordable housing elsewhere. Margaret Harwood is back in her home but with the federal grant only covering a portion of what will be needed to construct a new housing community, she wants to know where she is supposed to go when the park is closed if an alternative isn't built by then.

"Where are we going to go?" Harwood said, adding that with pets it is difficult to find affordable rental units. "I'll sleep on the streets rather than get rid of one of my animals."

The Affordable Housing Committee members say they won't allow any of those residents be put out on the streets but answers to their questions, they don't have.

"There are a lot of unanswered questions," Chairwoman Catherine Yamamoto said.

Ideally, cottages will be built on the Lowry site off Stratton Road with the help of private developers. The residents of the Spruces will be provided with relocation costs and the ability to move into those cottages and still pay about the same amount in rent.

The committee is confident that the town will receive the grant but the details of the Lowry site development are far from being completed. The residents wanted to know such details as if the cottages will have the same amount of space as their current homes but the committee said it's too early to tell.



"Whatever happens, it isn't going to happen quickly," committee member Van Ellet said. "It could take years."

The Lowry property is currently the front runner for development but there are others still being examined, according to the committee. Use of the land is already facing debate among agriculturalists who see it as a net loss of conserved space.

The committee is fairly certain the park will be closed eventually but, as it was when Hurricane Irene hit more than a year ago, the future of the Spruces residents is still unknown.

But they are not the only residents the Affordable Housing Committee is examining. It has been tasked with addressing the town's shortfall of affordable housing that existed even before the storm.

On Tuesday, the committee agreed to accept a bid from John Ryan, of Amherst, to perform a study of the town's housing stock. Ryan performed a study of the housing stock 12 years ago, finding a lack of affordable housing. His results were incorporated into the master plan with the goal of increasing the amount.

"My guess is the demographics haven't changed that much in 10 years," Yamamoto said, but grant funding requires updated studies.

The committee had not seen the price but agreed to accept the bid as long as it was under the allocated $25,000. Ryan was the only bid.

"If we're only going to get one response, we're lucky it was his," Yamamoto said.


Tags: affordable housing,   conserved land,   housing survey,   Irene,   Spruces,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories