Former Pittsfield School Fate Still Uncertain After Demo Delay

By Joe DurwinPittsfield Correspondent
Print Story | Email Story

The location of the former Plunkett School on Fenn Street is being considered for doughnut franchise but some hope the historic building can be saved for other uses.
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The future of a former school building deemed historically significant remains uncertain at the conclusion of a six-month demolition delay enacted in May.

No new development plan has come forth since the delay was enacted, according to City Planner Cornelius J. Hoss, and there is continued interest from the Cafua Management Co. in eliminating the 103-year-old Fenn Street structure to make room for a drive-through doughnut shop. 

"You can expect you'll be hearing about a renewed application from them in the near future," Hoss told the Pittsfield Historical Commission on Monday.

Cafua has an option to purchase the property from its current owners, Forer Development Co., which plans to raze the structure to construct a new restaurant with drive-through service. Cafua is the largest privately owned Dunkin' Donuts operator in the country. The new operation is expected to be a replacement for its existing eatery at 18 First St., a location which has raised concerns from the city about traffic issues in recent years. 

The former Plunkett School building has been available for sale since 1987, and been vacant of all occupancy since 2009. A previous offer from another developer interested in converting the building to affordable housing has failed to win over its owners, because of the proposal's dependence on funding and approvals that could take one to two years.


Commission Chairman Will Garrison asked Hoss if the city's inclusion of the building in a newly created Housing Development Zone offered any hope of attracting interest in market-rate housing such as that being planned by Allegrone Construction for the Howard building just across the street at 124-132 Fenn St.  The city planner said the structural modifications the building would need would probably be prohibitive to market-rate developments.

"Affordable housing, because there's so many different avenues of financing," said Hoss, "that there could be a way to overcome that."

Hoss stressed to the commission that the expiration of the demolition delay on Nov. 1 did not necessarily mean that demolition was inevitable. Cafua Management will still need to go through the normal process of acquiring permits for its proposed construction. Because the eatery will involve a drive-through window, permitting will ultimately require a vote of approval by the City Council.

"There'll still be a lot of hoops," said Hoss. "A developer is not going to demolish a building unless it first has approval for what it wants to do."

Tags: demolition,   Dunkin' Donuts,   historical building,   school building,   vacant building,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories