Pittsfield Council Drops Controversial No Confidence Vote

By Joe DurwinPittsfield Correspondent
Print Story | Email Story

A petition targeting the performance of the city's solicitor was filed by unanimous vote of the City Council.
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council did not vote Tuesday on a petition of no confidence in City Solicitor Kathleen Degnan after hours of vicious debate.

The split in a large crowd of attendees determined by outbursts of applause to the two opposing arguments was akin to the voter divide in the city's most recent election. 

The outcry against the petition for a vote of no confidence in Degnan dominated those who addressed the council during an hourlong open-microphone period.

The petition, put forth by Ward 1 Councilor Christine Yon and Council President Kevin Sherman, challenged the "professional competence"  as the city's legal representation if a case that ended with a $100,000 settlement paid to Spectrum Health Systems and allowed the company to open a methadone clinic on Summer Street. Ultimately the petition would be filed and no vote was taken.

The methadone clinic, which opened on Tuesday, provoked debate across the city for nearly a year.
 
"She's not a player in some of your political worlds, and therefore a very easy target," said the city's Director of Administrative Services Donna Mattoon, who berated the councilors who've opposed Degnan for casting her in a harsh light in the media. "This is a heartless and a thoughtless vote."
 
Former Councilor Joseph Nichols condemned the non-binding petition challenging Degnan, "I consider it to be a complete waste of time, and an embarrassment to the city of Pittsfield," he said.
 
"Christine Yon is being unjustly sniped, for no good reason, other than sticking up for her constituents," said Robert Skowron, of Pittsfield, though he also defended Degnan, and urged the council to move past Spectrum-related issues.
 
"The mayor inherited a nightmare ... it's got to stop, folks," said Skowron, whose June 14 email to the mayor and council accusing Mayor Daniel Bianchi of not being transparent about an initial settlement plan to locate the clinic on Stoddard Avenue was instrumental in the backlash of protest that scrapped the plan, delaying a settlement agreement. "Let's move on. There's no need for any of this."
 
Councilor Yon defended the merits of her complaints against Degnan, as outlined in a six-page document provided (see timeline, pages 89-95) in which she says information taken out of context from what she believed to have been a private meeting with Bianchi and the city solicitor was referenced by Degnan during court proceedings and later became cited as supporting evidence in a new injunction filed by Spectrum promptly thereafter.
  
"I wasn't looking to get anyone," said Yon, who along with Sherman originally met with the mayor on Sept. 6 to ask that he consider removing Degnan from her position as solicitor. "I was looking for answers."
 
Councilors Barry Clairmont, Jonathan Lothrop and John Krol voiced strong support for the petition, while Councilors Christopher Connell, Melissa Mazzeo and Kevin Morandi criticized the move.
 
Lothrop revisited previous statements made by himself, Clairmont and Krol to local media outlets in late August, saying he felt mislead by Degnan during a series of June budget discussions about the nature of a sum set aside for litigation settlement.
 
"If department heads or other individuals or officials are not giving the City Council factual, truthful, honest information, I'm apt to make bad decisions on your behalf," said Lothrop. "And I'm very upset by the fact that I do feel that in this case I was mislead."
 
"There appears to be a pattern here that greatly concerns me," Krol concurred.
 
"How is this going to benefit the city?" asked Morandi. "What attorney Degnan did, what this administration did [with respect to the Spectrum suit] was the right move to settle this quickly and get out."
 
"I don't believe in the process that we're going about this," said Connell. "This step is just too extreme." 
 
After extensive discussion of the litigation, Yon ultimately made a motion to file her petition, taking the no-confidence vote off the table.
 
"I'm hoping in the future when we go to the mayor with their concerns, they're taken seriously," said Yon.  "I'm extremely frustrated with the dialogue that's been going on, and that's not been going on."  
 
"As much as I'm very glad that we're going to file this, at the same time, we have just dragged her [Degnan's] reputation through the mud," said Mazzeo.  "Going forward, this should never, ever happen again."
 
Bianchi vehemently criticized the way in which Yon had handled her grievances with the city solicitor.
 
"You said you made every effort to communicate with me. You showed up unannounced with the council president, and you requested that I ask for the resignation of our solicitor," said Bianchi. "I don't consider that to be a tremendous effort."
 
The council voted unanimously to file the petition.

Tags: city council,   city solicitor,   lawsuit,   petition,   Pittsfield,   Spectrum Health,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories