image description
The Williamstown Affordable Housing Trust Fund Board of Trustees, from left, Thomas Sheldon, Fred Puddester, Chairman Stan Parese, Catherine Yamamoto and Richard DeMayo meets on Wednesday evening

Hurdles, Frustration for Williamstown Housing Committee

By Stephen DravisSpecial to iBerkshires
Print Story | Email Story

Two sites being considered for possible for housing will both require environmental remediation. A review of the conditions at the former PhoTech site on Cole Avenue, above, has been completed and further study of the former town garage site on Water Street has been approved.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Affordable Housing Committee on Wednesday voted to fund further study of contaminated soil at the former town garage site, which the committee has identified as its primary target for a housing project.

In a unanimous vote of the three committee members in attendance, the panel decided to allocate $13,350 for the study, which will follow up on initial findings that one area of 59 Water St. has contaminant levels which require a report to the commonwealth's Department of Environmental Protection.

"There are some areas of residual contamination from underground storage tanks," said Affordable Housing Committee Chairwoman Catherine Yamamoto, who also serves on the Affordable Housing Trust board.

"One area is reportable. [Environmental consultant] O'Reilly, Talbot & Okun came back with a proposal for $13,350 to do further study on the reportable site and estimate the cost of cleanup," she said.

In a separate meeting Wednesday, the board of trustees of the town's Affordable Housing Trust Fund heard reports on both the former town garage site and the former PhoTech mill property at 330 Cole Ave., the so-called "cube," which also has been suggested as a possible site for housing development.

Town Manager Peter Fohlin told the trustees one of the "areas of concern" at the Water Street location requires reporting to the state Department of Environmental Protection and "further investigation and possible remediation." Meanwhile, engineering firm Tighe & Bond has completed a study at the PhoTech site, finding "a compromised and deteriorating structure, asbestos-containing and hazardous materials and concentrations of cadmium and silver."

Fohlin said he and Department of Public Works Director Timothy Kaiser are meeting with representatives from Tighe & Bond next week to discuss the report. Fohlin said the findings were not surprising but rather more detailed and useful information about the problems at the former mill site.

At their meeting, the Affordable Housing Committee's Yamamoto, Bilal Ansari and Van Ellett voted to fund the 59 Water St. study with the provision that the committee press the Springfield-based O'Reilly, Talbot & Okun for an early completion of its assessment.

Ansari expressed frustration with the time it takes to advance potential projects, particularly in light of the town's increased need for affordable housing after last year's flooding at the Spruces Mobile Home Park.

"Every site is urgent," Ansari said. "The Spruces is real. Everything is at least two or three years out, so everything is urgent."

Yamamoto agreed that the committee needs to keep the issue of affordable housing on the front burner in the town.

"I know our cause is urgent, but we have to be realistic about how long these things take," Yamamoto said. "Every site we look at has some issue that holds us up – it has contamination, it's in conservation or it's owned by someone else. The best we can do is meet each hurdle as it comes along."

Ellett, who also serves on the Conservation Commission, said the Affordable Housing Committee also needs to begin discussing the possibility of developing part of the 30-acre former Lowry Farm off Stratton Road.

"Water Street remains our No. 1 spot," Yamamoto said. "As we said from the beginning, everything is on the table, including Lowry and Burbank."

The 139-acre former Burbank Farm is located between Stratton and Luce roads. It is the largest parcel in town controlled by the Conservation Commission.

"Yes, [Lowry and Burbank are] in conservation, but we're talking about possibly developing a fraction of those properties," Yamamoto said.

The two conserved properties came up again at the Affordable Housing Trust Fund meeting, and Trustee Richard DeMayo said he expects it would be "a battle" to get the Conservation Commission on board with the idea.


Town Manager Peter Fohlin, right, reports to the trust fund board.
Yamamoto said she understands it is a lengthy process to get lands taken out of conservation – a process that involves votes at two separate town meetings. But her committee wants to keep the Lowry and Burbank properties on the table.

"It's a lengthy process to get them out [of conservation], but it's not impossible," she said. "We feel it's important to keep talking about those sites. People in town should think of them as potential sites for affordable housing.

"The need has become dire and urgent."

On another front, the Affordable Housing Committee agreed to meet again on Tuesday to finalize a letter outlining a scope of services for an analysis of the town's housing market.

Yamamoto reported to the committee that she has learned that an updated analysis is important if the town hopes to secure grant money for affordable housing projects.

"We need to have done for us a professional market analysis and study of our housing needs," she said. "The data we have is 12 years old, and while I don't think the town has changed that much, when you apply for federal money, the data has to be updated every six months."

Tags: affordable housing,   affordable housing trust,   Photech,   Spruces,   town garage,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Guest Column: Full Steam Ahead: Bringing Back the Northern Tier Passenger Railroad

by Thomas HuckansGuest Column

You only need a glance outside to see a problem all too familiar to Berkshire county: closing businesses, a shrinking population, and a stunning lack of regional investment.

But 70 years ago, this wasn't an issue. On the North Adams-Boston passenger rail line before the '60s, Berkshires residents could easily go to Boston and back in a day, and the region benefited from economic influx. But as cars supplanted trains, the Northern Tier was terminated, and now only freight trains regularly use the line.

We now have a wonderful opportunity to bring back passenger rail: Bill S.2054, sponsored by state Sen. Jo Comerford (D-Hampshire, Franklin, and Worcester), was passed to study the potential for restoring rail from Boston to North Adams. In the final phase of MassDOT's study, the project is acquiring increased support and momentum. The rail's value cannot be understated: it would serve the Berkshire region, the state, and the environment by reducing traffic congestion, fostering economic growth, and cutting carbon emissions. The best part? All of us can take action to push the project forward.

Importantly, the Northern Tier would combat the inequity in infrastructure investment between eastern and western Massachusetts. For decades, the state has poured money into Boston-area projects. Perhaps the most infamous example is the Big Dig, a car infrastructure investment subject to endless delays, problems, and scandals, sucking up $24.3 billion. Considering the economic stagnation in Western Massachusetts, the disparity couldn't come at a worse time: Berkshire County was the only county in Massachusetts to report an overall population loss in the latest census.

The Northern Tier could rectify that imbalance. During the construction phase alone, 4,000 jobs and $2.3 billion of economic output would be created. After that, the existence of passenger rail would encourage Bostonians to live farther outside the city. Overall, this could lead to a population increase and greater investment in communities nearby stops. In addition to reducing carbon emissions, adding rail travel options could help reduce traffic congestion and noise pollution along Route 2 and the MassPike.

The most viable plan would take under three hours from North Adams to Shelburne Falls, Greenfield, Athol, Gardner, Fitchburg, Porter, and North Station, and would cost just under $1.6 billion.

A common critique of the Northern Tier Rail Restoration is its price tag. However, the project would take advantage of the expansion of federal and state funds, namely through $80 billion the Department of Transportation has to allocate to transportation projects. Moreover, compared to similar rail projects (like the $4 billion planned southern Massachusetts East-West line), the Northern Tier would be remarkably cheap.

One advantage? There's no need to lay new tracks. Aside from certain track upgrades, the major construction for the Northern Tier would be stations and crossings, thus its remarkably short construction phase of two to four years. In comparison, the Hartford line, running from Hartford, Conn., to Springfield spans barely 30 miles, yet cost $750 million.

In contrast, the Northern Tier would stretch over 140 miles for just over double the price.

So what can we do? A key obstacle to the Northern Tier passing through MassDOT is its estimated ridership and projected economic and environmental benefits. All of these metrics are undercounted in the most recent study.

Crucially, many drivers don't use the route that MassDOT assumes in its models as the alternative to the rail line, Route 2. due to its congestion and windy roads. In fact, even as far west as Greenfield, navigation services will recommend drivers take I-90, increasing the vehicle miles traveled and the ensuing carbon footprint.

Seeking to capture the discrepancy, a student-led Northern Tier research team from Williams College has developed and distributed a driving survey, which has already shown more than half of Williams students take the interstate to Boston. Taking the survey is an excellent way to contribute, as all data (which is anonymous) will be sent to MassDOT to factor into their benefit-cost analysis. This link takes you to the 60-second survey.

Another way to help is to spread the word. Talk to local family, friends, and community members, raising awareness of the project's benefits for our region. Attend MassDOT online meetings, and send state legislators and local officials a short letter or email letting them know you support the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Project. If you feel especially motivated, the Williams Northern Tier Research team, in collaboration with the Center for Learning in Action (CLiA), would welcome support.

Living far from the powerbrokers in Boston, it's easy to feel powerless to make positive change for our greater community. But with your support, the Northern Tier Rail can become reality, bringing investment back to Berkshire County, making the world greener, and improving the lives of generations of western Massachusetts residents to come.

Thomas Huckans, class of 2026, is a political science and astronomy major at Williams College, originally from Bloomsburg, Pa.

Survey: This survey records driving patterns from Berkshire county to Boston, specifically route and time. It also captures interest in the restoration of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail. Filling out this survey is a massive help for the cause, and all responses are greatly appreciated. Use this link.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories