Fake IDs Land Pittsfield Bar in Busload of Trouble

By Joe DurwinPittsfield Correspondent
Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city's Licensing Board severely chastised a local tavern Monday after an account by Pittsfield Police of masses of underage drinkers found there on July 21.

According to Lt. Michael Grady, Pittsfield Police corralled busloads of youths, numbering as many as 70, who may have been served at the Back Nine Bar & Grill on Crane Avenue that night, most of whom appear to have entered the bar using false IDs. The discovery of the under-21 patrons at the GEAA club came during an areawide sweep involving multiple departments known as Operation One Team One Mission.

Grady told the Licensing Board that officers making a stop at the bar encountered a number of visibly underaged patrons. Upon investigation, they found numerous youths who had been transported by a tour bus chartered as part of a reunion for alumni of Camp Greylock.

"Anyone could see they were underage," said Grady of some of the individuals police ejected from the establishment. Grady said at least 10 to 15 of the youths were spotted inside the bar, with the others being detained outside.

Back Nine manager Brian Uliasz said the bar is not to blame for their presence, claiming the alleged offenders entered the bar using convincing fake IDs.

"They did not get into my bar without an ID that said they were 21," Uliasz told the board, adding that fake IDs used that night duped two TIPs-certified people he had working the door.

Grady said 41 forged IDs were confiscated, many of them fake New York licenses similar to the minors' actual IDs.

"If you look at these IDs, they have holograms on them," said Uliasz, "A police officer came up to me and said 'If you don't have a scanner, there's no way you can tell those were fake.'"

"You're in a business where you have to take extraordinary measures — extraordinary measures," countered Chairman Carmen Massimiano, who noted that the bar has been before the board on two prior occasions, though not for serving minors. "No extraordinary measures have been taken."

"We're talking about two or three busloads of people, not just two or three that slipped under the radar," said board member Dana Doyle.

The board voted 3-1 to enact a 14-day suspension for the Back Nine Bar & Grill. Thomas Campoli voted in opposition, instead favoring a five- or seven-day imposed suspension with an additional suspension period left un-imposed, which could be invoked immediately if bar had another incident in the next year.

Albert Pisani, whose eligibility to serve on the board was recently brought into question over his association with the GEAA, where Back Nine is located, recused himself from the hearing.

By law, the bar can appeal to the state's Alcohol Beverages Control Commission; Uliasz told iBerkshires he did not know yet whether he would file an appeal.

Tags: license board,   license suspension,   underage drinking,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Council to See 10-Year Charter Review Report

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Following almost two years of work, the Charter Review Committee has made its recommendations to the City Council.

Tuesday's council agenda includes the committee's report dealing with governance items such as the charter objection, term limits, and financial procedures. Every 10 years, a panel reviews the City Charter, which defines the city's structure of government.

"The Charter Review Committee was established by city ordinance in May 2023. Its first meeting took place on August 7, 2023, under the direction of City Solicitor Stephen Pagnotta," Chair Michael McCarthy's executive summary reads.

"Solicitor Pagnotta informed the committee that its mission is to offer recommendations to city government concerning the Charter."

The charter objection was the most discussed issue throughout the preview process.  Members determined "the City's interest in a functioning government is not served well by a Charter' Objection being made by a sole Councilor."

The nearly 50-page report proposes amendments to Article 2 Section 9C, Charter Objection, to allow for discussion, require three supporters, and be prohibited when it pertains to the proposed budget for the upcoming fiscal year.

"The Committee felt strongly that the budgetary process should not be held hostage to a Charter Objection. The process of approving a budget under the Charter involves months of hearings with firm calendar restrictions, leading to a budget that must be in place before each fiscal year begins," McCarthy wrote.

"A Charter Objection during this process would have the potential to disrupt and delay the budget being in place on July 1 of each fiscal year."

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories