Downing Nearly Joined 2012 Congress Race

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
state Sen. Benjamin B. Downing
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — State Sen. Benjamin Downing nearly threw his name into the ring for Congress.

The Pittsfield Democrat hired a political consulting group, Washington D.C.-based 4C Partners, to explore a congressional run in January 2011. Downing said recently that he knew U.S. Rep. John Olver was nearing retirement, which the Amherst Democratic announced in October 2011, and considered running for the seat but the "pieces didn't fall into place."

Redistricting in 2011 lumped part of U.S. Rep. Richard Neal's 2nd Mass District into Olver's 1st  District. The Berkshires' Andrea F. Nuciforo Jr. announced in 2008 and Bill Shein in January their candidacies for the Democrat nomination.

While Downing didn't specify why he decided not to run, he did say he would have been more likely to if the district hadn't been changed so dramatically. Then again, he also said that 12-termer Neal was not unbeatable.

Downing paid a total of $15,837 to 4C for consulting fees, $3,500 a month for six months, according to campaign finance disclosures.

His probe of a possible run came months after a 2010 letter from Democratic leaders urging Nuciforo, Downing's predecessor in the state Senate, not to run against Olver. The letter, from "Concerned Democrats of Berkshire County" and signed by Democratic leaders Sherwood Guernsey and Lee Harrison, asked Nuciforo to step out of the 2012 race over concerns it would "fracture" the party. It came at a time when Democrats had lost a majority in the House of Representatives.

The letter made no mention of Downing and encouraged Nuciforo to run if Olver, about to begin his 10th term, decided to retire. Olver had frequently reiterated his determination to run in 2012 but many believe he was pushed into retiring by fellow Democrats to avoid a battle between political veterans because of redistricting.

Just two days after Olver announced his retirement last fall, Shein, a political activist and writer, wrote a lengthy article in the Berkshire Record criticizing Downing's funding raising , which brought the 4C Partners expenditure to light.


Shein jumped into the race in January with a platform that includes banning contributions from lobbyists. Lobbyists were the topic of Shein's Oct. 28, 2011, article (posted on Red Crow News) in which he alleges Downing voted on anti-worker laws related to Cranwell Spa & Resort  because of campaign money he received from lobbyists.

Downing would arguably have been the best-known Berkshire candidate, considering his Berkshire, Hampden, Franklin Senate district overlaps much of the western section of the new 1st Mass District. Neal, who brings his home ground of the Springfield metro region and east to Charlton along the state's southern border, has at least five times as much money and the endorsement of Olver.

While Downing believes Neal is beatable, the race could be an uphill battle for the two "home team" candidates because of lack of funds and the likelihood of splitting votes.

For the most recent reporting period ending Dec. 31, Neal had $2.5 million in cash, more than a half-million from political action committees. Nuciforo reported $137,000 on hand, and raising the bulk of his funds, $98,000, from individuals. Shein had nothing to report.

No Republican candidate has yet emerged so the Sept. 6 Democratic primary could determine the district's next congressman.

As for Downing, he said if he had to support a term limit for state officials, it would be 10 years. This is Downing's sixth year in the Senate. When asked what's next, he said he wasn't sure yet but he doesn't expect to be a state senator for life.

Tags: Ben Downing,   election,   


If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories