Mass. To Lose House Seat

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — The state is one of 10 that will lose representatives in the U.S. House of Representatives following Tuesday’s release of Census data.
 
State officials were expecting the loss, the first since 1992, and legislative leaders recently formed a redistricting committee. There will now be nine representatives, down from 10.
 
The state joins Iowa, Missouri, Pennsylvania, Michigan, New Jersey, Illinois, Louisana with states that will lose one representative; New York and Ohio will both lose two.
 
Texas gained the most seats with four. Washington, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, Georgia and South Carolina all gained one seat and Florida two.
 
The Bay State's population did increase, but at a slower rate than other states. The population increased by 3.1 percent to 6,547,629. The data also shows that the state is the fifth most dense in the country.
 
U.S. Rep. John W. Olver, D-Amherst, in a statement, vowed that the long-anticipated announcement does not curtail his plans to run for re-election in 2012.
 
"The loss of a seat in Massachusetts was expected. The Census Bureau released some interim population data over the last decade, and all of the academic models predicted that Massachusetts would likely lose a seat," said Olver. "Given this announcement, the Massachusetts Legislature must now re-apportion the state into nine congressional districts of equal population instead of 10.  

"No one can know what the extent of district changes will be until the Legislature finishes its job, but some districts will inevitably undergo significant change as all of the remaining nine will have to add population. Specific redistricting options will be weighed and considered by the Legislature, and the final decision on what to do rests with the Legislature alone."
 
The 1st Massachusetts District, which covers nearly the entire western half of the state, could get larger. Urban areas in the central part of the state could be added and the redistricting will have a major impact on federal funding. 
 
Berkshire Middle Register of Deeds Andrea F. Nuciforo Jr. has requested a series of local hearings to ensure that the interests of small cities and towns are fairly represented in the redistricting process. Nuciforo, also a Democrat, announced last year that he will challenge Olver.

The changes could also affect the number of state representatives in the western end of the state.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More State Stories