image description
Adams town meeting members stand to be counted.

Two Down: Adams Town Meeting Moves Hoosac Project

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Selectwoman Paula Melville and former selectman George Haddad, left, were opposite sides of the issue but both urged town meeing to think of the children of Adams when they voted.


ADAMS, Mass. — The outcome wasn't really a surprise; a number of town meeting members had said their vote wasn't so much for the high school reconstruction as for the chance for all the voters to weigh in on the project at the ballot.

Still, the vote of 103-10, far beyond the needed 2/3 majority, sent a whoop of applause through the spectators in the dark auditorium at Plunkett Elementary School on Tuesday night.

The applause had actually begun earlier, when the overwhelming majority of the town meeting members seated in the center aisles stood to be counted.

This was the second vote the $40.5 million project had to pass; the first was Monday night in Cheshire, where it was approved by a similar margin. The matter know goes to ballot box, with voting in Adams on Thursday and Cheshire on Saturday to approve a Proposition 2 1/2 debt exclusion.

Adams town meeting members, however, were more vocal in both their support and opposition to the project that will cost the town at least $8.6 million and relocate the middle school to the high school.

Several speakers brought up many of the same issues raised at previous information meetings — the inclusion of refurbishing recently fixed athletic fields and track, the use of a (slightly pitched) flat roof, the cost of LEED certification.

Francis Waterman, co-chairman of the building committee, tried to answer each point (the track hadn't been fixed but sealed, the roof had just been redone, and the LEED aspects while expensive could actually mean a return on energy costs within a decade). Some factors, such as a second gym for the middle school wing, are mandated by the state, he said.

John R. Cowie Jr., representing Precinct 3, expressed skepticism about the LEED pay back and frustration that the towns hadn't had more options. If the town had to spend $8.6 million, it should be cutting somewhere, he continued. "If times are tough you tighten the belt. Why is it every time there's a project proposed by a public body they say they can't [cut back]."

"I leave it to yourself to make up your own minds on the matter, but remember that you represent a precinct,"  Cowie told the meeting members.

Jeffrey Lefebvre of Precinct 2 said voters had to remember they weren't spending $8.6 million but more like $14 million with interest. And he wasn't convinced it was do or die — there's time to reconsider, he insisted, without losing state funding.

When to Vote
Cheshire
Town Meeting: Approved

Debt Exclusion Vote
Saturday, Oct. 23
10 to 4, Senior Center


Adams
Town Meeting: Approved

Debt Exclusion Vote
Thursday, Oct. 21
7 to 7, DPW garage

More information on the project can be found on the building committee's
Facebook page, FAQ and a site set up by parents at hurricanepride.com

Still, he said he would vote for the project to move it to the ballot box. "I don't think a 110-115 people should be making this decision."

James J. Fassell, Precinct 5, said everyone was looking at the wrong way. "We all ask how much it's going to cost. I always ask how much money is going to come into our town. ... We have an opportunity to bring $28.5 million into this community."

Former selectman George Haddad, also representing Precinct 5, said the town had to think of the needs of the kids. Besides, he continued, "whatever we do, we're going to have to pay ... for this project or the next one."

Selectwoman Paula Melville, a strong opponent of relocating the middle school students, made a final impassioned plea to vote the project down and prevent the loss of "another neighborhood school."

"We're making a monumental decision here," she said. "We are being asked to invest millions of state and local taxes into something that we don't own ... Do you want to give up Memorial?"

She argued it would be cheaper to build an elementary school to alleviate the overcrowding and alluded to the statement of interest submitted last year for Cheshire Elementary School's hoped-for renovation as proof of a plan to ship Adams children to Cheshire. Cheshire's statement referred to the Adams sixth-graders becoming elementary students; the Hoosac project has them at the high school.

"Let's not make this a monumental mistake," she said. "we have to do right by our kids .... please vote no."

Tuesday night Melville lost but as everyone prepared to leave, one voice reminded everone: "see you at the ballot box."

In other business, town meeting also approved the friendly taking of a parcel land at Columbia Memorial Park. The land had once been owned by Berkshire Cotton Manufacturing, now Berkshire Hathaway and conveyed to the town in 1916 but not properly recorded. National Grid, which had demolished and cleaned an electrical station there, found the ambiguity during a title search.

Berkshire Hathaway wants nothing to do with the land, not even to touch the deed, but has agreed to sign a release if the town will take it. Town Counsel Edmund St. John III said the votes authorize the Selectmen to take action but that won't happen until Berkshire Hathaway signs the release ensuring it won't sue or otherwise renege on the deal.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Governor Healey Signs Breast Cancer Screening Bill

BOSTON — Today, Governor Maura Healey signed An Act Relative to Medically Necessary Breast Screenings and Exams for Equity and Early Detection.

This comprehensive legislation will ensure that patients have access to follow-up breast cancer screenings and exams, while also preventing any increase in patient cost-sharing by 2026. 

"We know that early detection of breast cancer saves lives. This legislation will help ensure that cost is not a barrier for women to get the screenings and care they need," said Governor Healey. "I'm grateful to the Legislature for their leadership on this bill, and to the patients, providers and advocates who made their voices heard in support of more affordable and accessible care for Massachusetts residents."  

This legislation would, starting in 2026, require insurers to cover diagnostic exams for breast cancer, digital breast tomosynthesis screening, and medically necessary and appropriate screening with breast MRIs and ultrasounds. This legislation would also prevent any increase in patient cost-sharing, thus removing cost barriers for patients who need more rigorous screenings due to dense breast tissue or abnormalities seen in their initial preventive screening mammograms. 

 

View Full Story

More Stories