image description
Brian Graber of American Rivers runs through the dam-removal project's checklist of DEP guidelines at a Conservation Commission hearing.

Briggsville Dam Slated for Removal This Summer

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Graber said his group has removed some 800 dams across the country to restore natural habitats.
CLARKSBURG, Mass. — The removal of the Briggsville Dam will likely begin in late July or in August, after the spawning season of the protected longnose sucker.

Representatives from the state and from American Rivers, a conservation group representing dam owner Cascade School Supplies, presented plans to the Conservation Commission on Wednesday night and laid out a time line for removal of the dilapidated dam.

"Removing dams is really our No. 1 river-restoration tool around the country," said Brian Graber, director of American Rivers' river restoration program. "Almost 800 dams have been removed around the country and I believe this will be the ninth in Massachusetts."

The aged dam that once powered the Strong-Hewat Woolen Mill has been deemed a safety hazard by state engineers and the cost to bring it up to safety standards have been pegged at $700,000 or more. Removing it and restoring the flow of the river will cost between $400,000 and $500,000.

Funding is being provided from sources including American Rivers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife and the federal Natural Resources Conservation Service.

About 10,920 cubic yards of sediment and rock built up over the past 20 years will be removed; about 1,000 cubic yards of larger material (15 inches or greater in diameter) will be repositioned, most in a flat section of the river bed near the Cross Road Bridge to slow the water and provide pools for fish. The rest will be hauled to Clarksburg Construction Co. for use in commercial projects.

The concrete dam will be taken down in three sections but the gear housing near the mill, now owned by Cascade, will be left in place as an historic marker. No road closures are expected as the work will be done at two access points on the river. That will include using private property; one parcel was donated to the town by the Bonas, the other requires a formal agreement for access.


A natural stone baffle will replace the concrete dam. Right, a longnose sucker.
Removing the dam and the small-scale sediment will improve the flow and the water quality of the North Branch of the Hoosic River, creating a more suitable habitat for longnose suckers and 13 other species including brook, brown and rainbow trout. Invasive plants will be disposed of off-site and replaced with native plants.

The project will proceed slowly and carefully over a period of six to eight weeks, said Nick Wildman, priority projects coordinator of the state's Division of Ecological Restoration. The construction will be monitored and assessed by licensed designer engineering firm Milone & MacBroom of Cheshire, Conn.


"From a fish standpoint, we didn't want to come into this and pump the stream down," he said. "If we move the project slowly, we'll allow natural movement of the fish."

If they have to be moved, it will be overseen by Dana Ohman, an aquatic biologist with the state's Division of Fisheries and Wildlife.

The some commissioners were less concerned with the fish and more with the safety of the Cross Road Bridge and nearby homes that would affected if the dam collapsed.

"Everything is in place so nothing catastrophic can go wrong and take the bridge out? Right?" asked commission member Debra LeFave, also chairman of the Selectmen.

Wildman said the state Highway Department had signed off on the project but borings will be taken to assure that the material under the anchoring hasn't moved.

"We've learned a lot mostly over the last 20 years, in how to proceed with these projects," said Graber. "We're extremely careful with all the analysis and design ... there's two years of analysis in this site."

Lauren Stevens of Stamford, Vt., representing Hoosic River Watershed Association, said his group "strongly endorsed" the project.

"We think it's terrific both for the fish and we think it will be a very attractive feature for the town," he said.

The project has received a waiver from the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act review but requires several more permits and acknowledgment letters from state and federal agencies before proceeding.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Dalton Green Committee Recommends Consultant for Action Plan

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
DALTON, Mass. — The Green Committee overwhelmingly recommended having Blue Strike Environmental as the town's consultant for its Climate Action Plan during its meeting on Monday. 
 
The town issued a request for proposals on March 27 and received two responses: one from Blue Strike Environmental, a Monterey, Calif., company, and the other from Capsus, an international firm based in Mexico. 
 
The committee wants to develop a climate action plan to achieve net zero by 2050 by seeking strategies to decrease the town's dependence on fossil fuels for homes, businesses, municipal facilities, and vehicles. 
 
The plan should be detailed enough, so the town knows what it needs to do and the timing to complete each subproject on time, the request for proposals said. 
 
During the meeting, committee members numerically rated the consulting firms based on the following categories: relevant experience, staffing plan and methodology, ability to complete projects on time, and proposed plan evaluation. Bluestrike's rating was four times higher across all criteria. 
 
Now that the committee has rated the second part of the bidding process, the bidders will submit the estimated cost of the project. 
 
The contract will be awarded to the firm offering the most "advantageous proposal" that takes into consideration all evaluation criteria and price. 
 
View Full Story

More Clarksburg Stories