Berkshire Mall Road Getting $10M in Stimulus Funding

Staff reportsiBerkshires
06:03PM / Monday, October 26, 2009Print Story | Email Story

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The long-delayed Berkshire Mall road is among 33 priority projects targeted for a second round of stimulus funding totaling more than $165.6 million.

The list released by the Patrick administration on Monday includes $10,128,284 for the two-mile roadway. It is a public road operated by the Baker Hill Road District with the Berkshire Mall its only taxpayer.

The main connector between Routes 7 and 8 has been waiting for state funding for more than decade but heavy traffic has severely deteriorated the road over its 20-year existence. The surface has gotten so bad, some ambulance services have refused to use it.

Built primarily as an access road to the mall, reconstruction plans signify its importance as a connector between North and Central Berkshire's main north/south highways.

The project includes widening sections of the winding road and eliminating the need to enter into the traffic ring around the mall. Instead, the road will run straight to Route 8 with right- and lefthand turns into the mall drive. It will include full reconstruction, resurfacing, guardrails, granite curbs, traffic signals, retaining walls signage and drainage improvements, along with work on the bridge.

Construction is expected to begin in 2010, if an agreement can be hammered out with two other stakeholders bordering the byway, Pittsfield and Petricca.

Also in the funding is $2.8 million for resurfacing First Street, Barker Road, Holmes Road and Valentime Road in Pittsfield.

"These projects put stimulus money and Massachusetts people to work," said Gov. Deval Patrick. "This administration is all about investing in our future, and these funds help."

The complete list can be found here.

iBerkshires.com Text Ads

rk MILES Blding Materials

Are You Ready to Update Your Home? Start With rk MILES. 4 Locations (800)670-7433

www.rkmiles.com

Now's the time...

to harvest value from your home. Click for more details about a HELOC. Insured by NCUA.

www.greylock.org

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Your Comments

iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.

Hurrah!
from: amy	on: 10-26-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0)

Talk about a bridge to nowhere! Too bad we couldn't stimulate education or food banks...
from: Somewhere	on: 10-26-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0)

Jeez I think it is sad that 10 million is going to roads, but 2 middle schools have closed, teachers getting laid off. Let's see what is more important, going to the mall or a child's education. If people still have values on education our students would be first. The state talks about low test scores and ways to raise them. Try taking the 10 million an invest in our future-educating children. Editor: The state's received millions in education stimulus funds. These funds are directly related to highway and bridge construction. The two middle schools would cost far more than $10M to fix.
from: anywhere	on: 10-26-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0)

Baker Hill Road District...you just got bailed out!
from: Mall freak	on: 10-27-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0)

Really, as a nation, this is all we can think of to do with $800 billion in stimulus money? Pave a bunch of roads? The asphalt producers of the world must be laughing all the way to the bank. Editor: Roads, yeah. Bunch of other stuff, too.
from: This is it?	on: 10-27-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0)

What a big crop of sour grapes are growing here in the Berkshires. Reconstructing roads will bring jobs (help keep bread on the table of workers) as well as making travel safer. Why not just be grateful something beneficial is being done with the stimulus money?
from: amy	on: 10-27-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0)

Amy - It's not an issue of sour grapes. Paving roads seems like a very short-lived benefit, however. We pave a few roads, a few people (look at the chart that is linked below) have jobs for a while. Is any of this money being spent on things that will have long-term impact? If so, the people who are communicating that news are doing a poor job, because all I ever hear about is road paving. If you look at that map (again, linked below), the total number of jobs created/saved is in the tens of thousands. That's great. But MILLIONS are unemployed -- that's thousands of thousands. I'm sure that without the stimulus we would be in worse shape. I just question the effectiveness of it.
from: This is it?	on: 10-27-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0)

I find your last comment contradictory. How can you question the effectiveness of the stimulus package, and still believe we would be worse off without it? I, too, would like to see all the unemployed back at work,but by putting paychecks in the hands of only thousands, we strengthen the cycle of production to respond to need and demand. A better trickle down theory, than waiting for the rich to have compassion on those less fortunate than them.
from: amy	on: 10-27-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0)

Sorry to drag this out... I should have been more clear and said we would be incrementally worse off. Here's the math, again using the figures from the map that the iBerkshires editor linked a couple of comments ago. If we generously assume that the stimulus money has created 100,000 jobs, well, that's great for those 100,000. That still leaves 15,000,000 people unemployed. That means there are still 150 people looking for work, for every job created. When I say I question the effectiveness, I am wondering if there was some better way to spend the money.
from: Is this it?	on: 10-27-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0)

Listen Editor - Keep your hands off the keys relative to the comments submitted. It is not likely that an opinion is needed in anything with which you do not agree. Let the comments stand alone. Editor: First, I'm providing facts not opinion. Second, my Web site, my rules.
from: northy_adams	on: 10-28-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0)

I love your website and I think you do a very fine job reporting.
from: Sandy Totter	on: 10-30-2009 12:00AM I Agree (0) - I Disagree (0)

Lanesborough Zoning Board Welcomes New Member

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
03:27PM / Wednesday, September 02, 2026

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. – The Zoning Board of Appeals has some new faces.

Last week, the Zoning Board met to restructure its board.

William Matthiesen was elected Chair. He is stepping in following the resignation of Mark Seigars after a heated ZBA meeting in February.

Gwen Miller was welcomed onto the board after being elected from the select board the day before. Chair Deborah Maynard had said she previously worked with Miller on the Planning Board.

"She is a very, very smart woman who is up to date on all the laws and everything else that goes around," Maynard said.

Miller said she wanted to volunteer for the town, but she is no stranger to working with the town. She moved to Lanesborough in 2017 to raise her kids and was recently serving as Chair of the Planning Board.

She has also served on the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission's regional issues committee for the town.

According to her LinkedIn, she has much experience with town planning, recently working with the town of Lenox as their land use director and town planner.

She said she hopes to bring a nice attitude to the board.

"Just an even keel, a polite demeanor and some objectivity."

View Full Story