Election 2009: Ruberto Issues Challenge For Education Debate

Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — James Ruberto has issued a challenge to candidate Dan Bianchi for a debate on how to achieve the highest possible quality of education in Pittsfield.

"Dan had earlier confined his campaign to only three debates, and I was never comfortable that three would provide ample opportunity to speak to key issues in the depth that the people of Pittsfield deserve," said Ruberto, who is running for a fourth term as mayor.

"In fact, I have already agreed to participate in a fourth debate sponsored by the Chamber of Commerce and WBRK, and now I am requesting that he debate me on the very important topic of education."

"I'm proud of the educational investments we have made in the past six years, reversing the tide of teacher layoffs approved by Dan Bianchi in budgets prior to me being mayor,” he continued. "We have changed the budgeting priorities in this city, with public safety and teachers now at the top.


"At the same time we have strengthened our police department and kept all of our fire stations open, we have added more than 40 teachers, aides and curriculum coaches. MCAS scores are rising, and so is the graduation rate." 

Ruberto said the date and time of the education debate would be set as soon as possible.

Submitted by the Campaign to Elect James Ruberto
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories