@theMarket: It's Not If But When Will Oil Fall?

By Bill SchmickiBerkshires Columnist
Print Story | Email Story
Bill Schmick
In homage to Jack Kirby, the creator of one of my favorite comic book heroes, the Fantastic Four, we took the liberty of casting oil as Doctor Doom, the Fab Four's arch nemesis in this column. Given the monumental angst over black gold all week it is appropriate.

I have to admit the oil price sliced right through my price target of $130 per barrel. In the futures pit, contracts as far out as December 2016 were changing hands at over $139 a barrel, up $9 on the day and that was only Tuesday.  Energy contracts to be delivered in 2012 are up 60 percent and shorter-term contracts have soared 35 percent since the beginning of the year. As the week closed oil was trading at $132.12 per barrel. The question on every investor's mind is where does it go from here?

Down is my prediction, maybe not next week but fairly soon. It's been my experience that when the talking heads start running headlines like "America's Oil Crisis" and Congress is spitting oil executives with their letter openers we should be nearing a top. 

Looking at a chart of oil Friday afternoon, the word "parabolic" comes to mind. It looks just like gold as it approached $1,000 per ounce a few weeks back. Commodity prices, as I've said before, tend to become over extended both on the upside and the downside. Worried investors seeing the gains this week will tend to chase prices rather then have the patience to wait for prices to come to them. My advice is to wait for a pullback. You will have ample opportunity to add or initiate positions in energy if you like.

 "But what if it doesn’t ever come down?" asked a colleague, itching to buy, "don't the fundamentals justify the price?"

Yes, I said, at least in the long term. The imbalance between supply and demand for energy is a multiyear issue and one of the reasons why I am so bullish on oil, natural gas and all kinds of alternative energy. But right now there is a timing problem in energy prices. Investors, who by their nature tend to extrapolate, are assuming that because there is an energy imbalance in the future that prices should reflect that immediately. It is a common mistake we all make.

superbowl Then speculators join the party and before you know it the price simply overtakes the fundamentals like it has now.  Usually, reason prevails at some point and equilibrium occurs.

But oil certainly clobbered the markets this week. The airlines were especially hard hit. Higher gas prices have rocked the industry that counts fuel as their second largest cost after labor. In response, the credit agencies put nine airlines on their credit watch Friday citing the industries difficulty in coping with fuel prices. 

Retailers, restaurants, lodging and gambling stocks were also sold as investors figured that $4-a-gallon prices at the pump spelled bad news for these sectors. See my column Independent Investor: "Running on Empty" this week for more on the energy markets.

As a result, all three averages registering losses of over 3.3 percent this week. The S& P 500 (-3.5 percent) has broken the critical support level at 1385 but only by 10 points and on light, pre-holiday volume. I will give it the benefit of the doubt until we see what happens next week but clearly the bulls are running out of room and time.  If oil continues to climb expect stocks to decline even further.     

In response to several e-mails and phone calls from confused readers, I thought I should set the record straight concerning this week's announcement that I had recently joined Dion Money Management. In fact, I have been working here at Dion for almost two years as vice president and portfolio strategist. I wish to express my gratitude to both Dion for their support and pride in my accomplishments as well as my readers for their interest and concern.

Bill Schmick is a licensed investment adviser representative and portfolio strategist with Berkshire-based Dion Money Management, managing more than $800 million for middle-class Americans from coast to coast. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-877-850-7942, Ext. 146, (toll free) or e-mail him at wschmick@dionmm.com. You can also visit www.afewdollarsmore.com for more of Bill's insight.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Council Passes $232.7M Budget

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council unanimously approved a $232.7 million budget for the upcoming fiscal year. 

It is a modest, almost 2.9 percent increase from FY26. 

"I do want to give the community kind of a heads up as we move forward on budgets. What we see coming out of the federal government that's trickling down to the states, it's going to be harder and harder for us as a community to meet our needs under the Proposition 2 1/2," Councilor at Large Alisa Costa said. 

"We're going to have challenges, as we've seen communities across the state trying to override the Proposition 2 1/2, because we have dwindling amounts of money coming from the state and federal government." 

She pointed out that, at the same time, utility bills are going up for both residents and the city, as are the costs of pavement and other items. 

The amended budget of $232,777,720, down from the $232,782,090 originally proposed, includes cuts to the Department of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and the restoration of funds for councilors to attend the annual Massachusetts Municipal Association conference. 

The Pittsfield Public Schools' $86,855,061 budget includes $68,886,061 in state Chapter 70 funding and $18 million from the city. With $345,000 in school choice and Richmond tuition revenues, it totals $87,200,061 and is an approximately $300,000 increase from the Pittsfield Public Schools' FY26 budget of $86.9 million. 

The district's budget will fund 13 schools, as Morningside Community School will retire in the fall, and includes the middle school restructuring. 

Councilors also approved the use of $2 million in certified free cash to reduce the tax rate, and appropriated $450,551 for parking-related expenditures. 

View Full Story

More Stories