Williamstown Defeats Wetlands, Open Space Bylaws

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
Voting with a ticket.
WILLIAMSTOWN — Voters torpedoed two controversial bylaws designed to promote open space in developments and to protect wetlands at Tuesday night's town meeting.

Some 435, or just under 10 percent of the town's registered voters decisively defeated an open-space residential development measure that would have provided breaks to developers who used cluster housing, 192-61.

The wetlands bylaw provoked far more debate and was defeated by a closer margin of 222-191. Its accompanying measure that would have instituted fines for wetlands incursions was withdrawn by the Planning Board.

Attempts at voice votes on both articles were discarded and the audience resorted to holding up blue tickets they received on registering at the meeting to show their positions. A motion to use Australian, or secret, ballot for the wetlands bylaw was defeated by voice vote.

<L2>The heads of both boards that put forward the bylaws said they would put it to their boards what to do next.

"I felt we had enough of an argument," said Conservation Commission Chairman Phillip McKnight, who pointed out the bylaw would have passed with just 16 more votes. "We'll take it up at our next meeting about what we want to do. We'll decide as a commission."

Planning Board Chairman Richard DeMayo echoed those sentiments, noting the board has two new members, Anne McCallum and Andrew Hogeland, who were elected last week. "We'll go back to the drawing board and see what direction this new board goes in."

All other questions on the 29-article warrant passed, including a $6 million general budget; $5 million elementary school budget and a $4.5 million assessment to the Mount Greylock Regional School Committee.

A request for $800,000 for the proposed Church Corners LLC affordable housing units in the former St. Raphael's Church and rectory on Cole Avenue raised concerns from neighbors but passed overwhelmingly, 346-38.<R3>

Despite the overwhelming support, Moderator Stanley Parese called for blue ticket vote for this article as well because the strong comments for and against the proposal.

Also passed was a resolution for the town to reduce its carbon footprint. The final article on the ballot, the resolution received a strong voice vote in the positive with only handful of nays from the back of the room.

<L4>The town also recognized citizens whose terms were up on various boards and committees.

Paul Langlois, who has operated the town's transfer station for 22 years, was named Employee of the Year and the Sam and Elizabeth Smith, former owners of Caretaker Farm, were presented the annual Faith R. Scarborough Award.

This article will be updated with more details in the morning.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Planning Board Narrowing in on Subdivision Bylaw Changes

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Planning Board late last month discussed specific features of what it plans to pass as a new subdivision control bylaw this year.
 
The board long has discussed the complex set of regulations as being out of date and cumbersome to both potential developers and the board itself, which has needed to hear requests for waivers of outdated rules for the handful of residential subdivisions that have been proposed in town in recent years.
 
This spring, the town engaged consultants from Northampton's Dodson and Flinker Landscape Architecture and Planning to go through the existing bylaw, compare it to more contemporary regulations in other communities and help craft a revised bylaw.
 
Unlike the zoning bylaw, where amendments require approval of town meeting, the subdivision control bylaw is a creation of the Planning Board, which can make changes on its own after a public hearing process it hopes to complete this year.
 
At a special Planning Board meeting on May 26, Dillon Sussman of Dodson and Flinker and his colleagues walked the board through a dozen different decision points that the board must resolve — either by leaving the bylaw as is or making a change — and offered suggestions based on best practices.
 
All of the issues are technical and ranged from the fundamental, like how the bylaw will define types of subdivisions, to the highly specific, like what turning radii will be required in new streets that are constructed to serve planned developments.
 
One example of a topic that came up in the recent approval of a four-home subdivision off Summer Street is stormwater management.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories