Aggie Commissioner Harvests Ideas

By Jen ThomasPrint Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD - The state's new agriculture commissioner says he's not a farmer - and doesn't pretend to be one.

So Douglas W. Petersen is going directly to the roots of the state's farming community to learn what he can do for them.

Addressing a room of nearly 100 regional farmers, growers, members of Berkshire Grown (a local farm advocacy group) and conservationists Tuesday night at the Berkshire Athenaeum, Peterson and Assistant Commissioner Scott J. Soares shared their hopes for the upcoming year while listening to locals' concerns about the future of their industry.

"I see the Department of Agricultural Resources as the primary agency for the Massachusetts farmer and I want to make sure we're serving their needs the best," said Petersen, who described his short time in office as a "trial by fire."

Chief among his promises was ensuring that all 6,100 farms in the state have resources available to them. Fielding questions about the creation of a dairy farm revitalization task force, an increase in federal grant money for the agricultural preservation restriction program and how to entice young people to embrace farming, Petersen said he intends to take ideas and priorities back from the Berkshires back to Boston.

"I've got a lot of new ideas about how to market Massachusetts," he said, adding that the night's best suggestion was placing and advertising farm stands on the Massachusetts Turnpike and at Logan Airport.

Petersen, a 17-year veteran of the State House, was named to the post in November by Gov. Deval Patrick. The Marblehead resident's nomination was greeted with a chorus of protests from some farmers and commercial growers who said he didn't have the experience for the job. Some said his strong environmental record on several issues was in opposition to farmers' needs.

Petersen and Soares were in the Berkshires as part of a listening tour aross the state and made stops at High Lawn Farm in Lee and Hilltop Orchards in Richmond.

"Agricultural is alive and well in the Berkshires, for sure," said Petersen.

At the Athenaeum, farmers and other residents expressed concerns about a variety of issues ranging from farmer's markets to right-to-farm communities to alternative energy possibilities.

In response to Adams Agriculture Commission Chairman Joseph Nowak's question about a loss of funds over the years for state agricultural fairs, Soares revealed that the Patrick hoped to put more money - $1 million over five years - into creating and improving fairs.

"I'm very proud to keep our fair going but it's more difficult now financially," said Nowak, who co-founded the fair 34 years ago. "We'd lose a lot if we lost our fairs."


Need Doctors

Prudy Barton, a member of the Lanesborough Agriculture Commission, said she hoped the commissioner would look into addressing the shortage of large-animal veterinarians in the area. With her farm's vet based in Shaftsbury, Vt., she said she is often forced to treat her animals herself.

Daniel Seitz, president of the board of directors of the Berkshire Co-op in Great Barrington and the only attendee to have the honor of asking two questions, wanted to know how to better support small organic and environmental programs when the federal farm bill provides subsidies primarily to large-scale farms.

"We're trying to shape the farm bill more to our liking and we're making progress," said Petersen. "This bill is far more friendly to the Northeast than any other bill I've ever seen."

The biggest source of trepidation for farmers at the meeting was the lack of education on farming and agriculture amongst the younger generation. With the average age of farmers pushing 50, Petersen said the state needs to come up with creative ways to recruit youth.

"My fear, given how the world is changing, is that it may not be enough," he said.

Petersen suggested seeking out legal immigrants (who may have come from rural backgrounds) to work on farms and help to run them.

Saying that most farmers are also conservationists, Petersen said he was committed to finding ways to utilize alternative and renewable energy sources.

"We're trying to bring alternative energy sources to the farms, not only for environmental reasons but also for economic reasons. Most farmers, we find, want to be environmentally-friendly. Every farmer sees himself as a conservationist, not necessarily an environmentalist. I want to ease that tension," said Petersen. "We should work together toward the same goal."

Following the listening sessions, the commissioner, as well as the Legislature, will work on bringing some of the farmers' ideas to fruition.

"We're going to follow up on some of the things we were talking about here," said state Rep. Denis E. Guyer, D-Dalton, who helped organize the commissioner's visit. "We've learned some new things and we've got some new ideas."
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Is the Select Board Listening to Dalton Voters?

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

A reasonable expectation by the people of a community is that their Select Board rises above personal preference and represents the collective interests of the community. On Tuesday night [Nov. 12], what occurred is reason for concern that might not be true in Dalton.

This all began when a Select Board member submitted his resignation effective Oct. 1 to the Town Clerk. Wishing to fill the vacated Select Board seat, in good faith I followed the state law, prepared a petition, and collected the required 200-plus signatures of which the Town Clerk certified 223. The Town Manager, who already had a copy of the Select Board member's resignation, was notified of the certified petitions the following day. All required steps had been completed.

Or had they? At the Oct. 9 Select Board meeting when Board members discussed the submitted petition, there was no mention about how they were informed of the petition or that they had not seen the resignation letter. Then a month later at the Nov. 12 Select Board meeting we learn that providing the resignation letter and certified petitions to the Town Manager was insufficient. However, by informing the Town Manager back in October the Select Board had been informed. Thus, the contentions raised at the Nov. 12 meeting by John Boyle seem like a thinly veiled attempt to delay a decision until the end of January deadline to have a special election has passed.

If this is happening with the Special Election, can we realistically hope that the present Board will listen to the call by residents to halt the rapid increases in spending and our taxes that have been occurring the last few years and pass a level-funded budget for next year, or to not harness the taxpayers in town with the majority of the cost for a new police station? I am sure these issues are of concern to many in town. However, to make a change many people need to speak up.

Please reach out to a Select Board member and let them know you are concerned and want the Special Election issue addressed and finalized at their Nov. 25 meeting.

Robert E.W. Collins
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories