EMS: Courage and Compassion in Action: U.S. Health Care: An Oxymoron?

By Shawn GodfreyPrint Story | Email Story
Shawn Godfrey///
Over the weekend, I had the pleasure (or displeasure depending who you ask) of seeing Michael Moore's new film, "Sicko." Yes, I said Michael Moore; the most incendiary filmmaker of our time has released another documentary. This time he tackles the U.S. health care system by presenting real-life examples of how the system is corrupt and the different ways it can turn a proverbial blind eye from its people. Although Moore spends a lot of time exploring health care in smaller European countries without actually comparing how they work or their overall statistics in relation to the U.S., I was deeply affected by "Sicko" and its description of the disastrous state of the outrageously expensive but poorly managed health-care system in the United States. The documentary walks viewers through several parts (as listed below), each highlighting separate health care issues in the U.S. and how the system is poorly structured and implemented:    ● Many Americans are potentially forced to reduce their overall quality of life because they are not adequately covered by health insurance. The film profiles one man who had to choose between saving either his middle or ring finger on his left hand after they were severed during a table-saw accident. Because of "limited eligibility requirements," his insurance carrier would only pay for one reattachment procedure. He chose the ring finger in order to continue wearing his wedding band.    ● Another unfortunate account includes denial of payment for ambulance services because a woman, who was seriously injured in a motor vehicle accident, didn't call her insurance provider from the accident scene for prior authorization for transport. When was she to call? After her momentary lapse of unconsciousness?    ● Most, if not all, health-care company medical directors, applicant reviewers and medical boards are employed for the sole purpose of denying membership coverage, and some are even offered incentives, like cash bonuses or extended vacation time, for meeting or exceeding a certain number of claim denials. Many companies also employ "health-care sleuths." These investigators are handsomely paid to scour through past medical records in order to find a reason for retroactively denying payment for care.    ● Hillary Rodham Clinton's crusade for socialized medicine, or "Hillarycare," burned up approximately 15 minutes of the film. This segment includes a video track from Ronald Reagan's infamous stance on U.S. health care, and President Nixon's clandestine support for Kaiser Permanente and the company's spearheading of the current "for-profit" model.    ● Unfortunately, the film weakly examines how the British, French, and Canadian systems work, although it does illustrate how some Americans manage to benefit from these other systems. One American woman, now living in France, says she feels guilty for the health-care advantages she is afforded while her parents, living in the U.S., are part of a vastly inferior system. Moore, frequently labeled as anti-American by the right, makes a point of presenting Canadians and French who are pro-American and conservative, but strongly believe that socialized medicine is the ideal health-care paradigm.    ● Sadly, the film shows how a fragmented system is able to dump patients from the hospitals to the doors of low-income clinics when they no longer have the means to pay for treatment. One scene portrays a taxi cab dropping off a disoriented elderly woman, barefoot and dressed in only a hospital gown, on the busy city streets. The woman continues to aimlessly wander until a nearby clinic's staff member intervenes.    ● The segment that affected me most is how 9/11 EMTs, firefighters and rescuers who, years after being heralded as heroes, are now unable to pay for medical care for illnesses acquired while volunteering at Ground Zero. A disturbing piece of the film reveals a high-ranking military official bragging that the care given to 9/11 terrorists detained at Guantanamo Bay (Gitmo) is far superior to the health-care citizens receive while living in the U.S. Moore personally takes a group of the volunteers to Gitmo. However, after being turned away, the 9/11 heroes are treated pro bono by Cuban doctors; receiving tests, medications and treatment strategies they were otherwise denied in the U.S. In addition, after hearing of their dilemma, a Cuban fire department honored the volunteers, dispelling the myth that most Cubans (like the French and Canadians) are viscerally anti-American.    ● A final part of the film, rich with irony, is when the No. 1 anti-Michael Moore site on the Web is nearly shut down because the webmaster couldn't afford to maintain the site and pay for his wife's ever-growing medical bills for cancer treatment. Moore anonymously sent a $12,000 check to the site founder and, to this day, the site is running stronger than ever. Judging by the testimonies expressed in the movie, albeit all of them containing a "Moore Slant," there is, in the very least, an iota of proof that the U.S. can provide far better health-care coverage for its people. Other than exorbitant capital gain for pharmaceutical companies and for lobbying politicians, the one question I was waiting for Moore to answer is: why do we pay more than the other countries profiled? The closest is France, which still only pays about half as much as we do and, bear in mind, their health-care coverage pays for physician house visits, nannies, and other ancillary medical assistance, like eyeglasses and time missed from work. I am certain film critics, film buffs and filmmakers are able to pick this movie apart much better than I, however, in the very least, I feel it does a wonderful job of bringing our health-care predicament to the forefront. It makes you think and, more importantly, makes you talk. Isn't that the point of most documentaries? With that in mind, this is a documentary everyone should see.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Brien Center Announces Vice President of Human Resources

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Amy Thomson was recently named Vice President of Human Resources for the Brien Center, Berkshire County's largest behavioral health provider. 
 
In her new position, she will provide strategic direction and oversight for all aspects of the Human Resources functional areas including recruitment and retention, employee relations, compensation and benefits, performance management and professional development.
 
Immediately prior to joining The Brien Center, Thomson served as the Vice President of Human Resources for the Annie Selke Companies. Other career positions include Director of Human Resources for Berkshire Healthcare Systems' Long Term Care Division, Vice President of Human Resources for Legacy Banks and Director of HR for Cranwell Resort, Spa and Golf Club. 
 
She is a resident of Pittsfield.
 
"We are excited that Amy has joined our leadership team, "said Christine Macbeth, President and CEO of the Brien Center. "The agency will benefit from her 30+ years in Human Resources and her skills in employee relations, compliance and benefit management, performance management and strategic focus. Her previous experience will serve her well as she leads her team in developing and implementing efficient and creative initiatives that will advance the HR components of the organization's strategic plan."
 
Thomson earned a Masters' Degree in Human Resources Management from Leslie University and a
Bachelor of Arts in Psychology from Boston College. She enjoys skiing, hiking, horseback riding and spending quality time with family and friends.
 
 
View Full Story

More Stories