Dalton Board OKs Talks for EV Stations

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Select Board has approved negotiations between the town and Livingston Energy Group for the installation of Direct Current Fast Chargers. 
 
Green Committee member Tony Pagliarulo presented to the board last month a proposal from the energy equipment and solutions business that would install dual-port 180-kilowatt, direct current fast chargers at Pine Grove Park, the Senior Center and Greenridge Park. 
 
This initiative would take two years to complete.
 
"If we get into the queue the very least we're ahead of the game of some other communities," Pagliarulo said. 
 
The project would install two chargers each at Pine Grove Park and the Senior Center, and one at Greenridge Park, with paving, painting, software, and maintenance being the only costs to the town.
 
"There are companies out there that are seeking to gain a footprint in the business and some of them are offering extraordinary terms including absorbing the town's cost after all of the rebates are received from Mass Electric," Town Manager Thomas Hutcheson said. 
 
This would also include parking improvement at Pinegrove and Greenridge, Hutcheson said. 
 
Pinegrove and Greenridge would have to be paved. The bollards and signage is included in the final cost, Pagliarulo said. 
 
Livingston Energy Group is a company dating back to 2017 with 7,000 installations that are primarily in the central New York area. 
 
"They're trying to get a footprint in Massachusetts toehold and the terms are generous in terms of what Eversource is offering for a rebate — 100 percent for make ready work and 100 percent for make ready for the customer side," Pagliarulo said. 
 
"So, the only thing that we are on the hook for is software and maintenance. Livingston is willing to absorb those costs. We would be simply responsible for the painting on the driveway. So, they're covering us to the tune of, you know basically $400,000 to $500,000." 
 
Eversource is covering the cost of the infrastructure.  
 
"They're assuming Eversource is going to cover $120,000 of infrastructure. That's where I'd like to have that in writing that no ifs or buts it's more you're covering it not the town," 
 
The town would own and determine the rate charged to EV customers and are billed through the Livingston Charge Port app. The revenue is issued to the town quarterly, deducted 9 percent. 
 
Prior to signing the agreement, Pagliarulo wants an engineer to come out to the proposed locations. 
 
"I want to make sure that whatever we were to sign in the future, we've done our homework before," Pagliarulo said.  "That the engineers come out here, I mean today things are done with a drone overhead and they can do a lot of that. I would ask that they come out here in person with some skin in the game."
 
He said he spoke to the Westport manager who had his machine in for a year and noted no difficulties. 
 
The board was not opposed to the initiative but did express concerns around the scope, longtime cost, usage data for these locations, and details surrounding the contract. 
 
Select Board Chair Joseph Diver said prior to receiving his support, he would want the contract and proposal reviewed in detail, adjust the scope of the work for the price, and a formal legal review. 
 
"I have a lot of different questions but they won’t be answered until I see the contract," Diver said. 
 
Included in the agreement the town would receive five years of the required software. Board members would like a projection on how much this software would cost when it is time to renew. 
 
Pagliarulo also recommended that the board consider purchasing two Level 2 chargers for the Senior Center, which would be identical to the ones at the Community Recreation Association. 
 
The initiative would install two two-port 19.2 kW chargers and remove the existing Level 2 chargers that are no longer functional. 
 
The existing chargers only have one functional port. The other port is blocked off by a town car. 
 
"I contacted the contractor and he pretty much said that the system, the parts, and material is really outdated given the technology that's gone on. And I took a picture of it. I think it goes back at least five years, maybe more," Pagliarulo said.
 
"My thought was better to upgrade rather than to repair. By the way, that [EV station] is illegal by today's standards because the charging station, it's across the sidewalk. It's not [Americans with Disabilities Act] compliant by any means." 
 
The new chargers would be ADA compliant and Pagliarulo would want it to be complete within 2024. 
 
The net cost of the initiative, including the removal of the current chargers would be $36,466 but the town would get a $23,200 reimbursement through the Department of Environmental Protection. 
 
Based on the current tax rate, a project like this would only be "pennies on the dollar," Pagliarulo said. 
 
"Based on the tax rate of 11 cents per thousand the bottom line to Dalton would be dollars on the tax rate. That is $13 would come out to like $5 or $6 on the tax bill," he said.
 
"Certainly the 40,000 would be more in the order of $50, not even, more like 
$40 so it's pennies on the dollar."
 
There are a lot of costly projects that the town has to accomplish, such as Walker Brook for approximately 250,000 and Dalton Division Road for $700,000, and paving of roads, so it may only look like "pennies on the dollar" when looking at the big picture it adds up, Diver said. 
 
" It’s pennies on a dollar until you look at $5 million in investments," Diver said. 
 
There may be other funding options the town can consider such as American Rescue Plan funds, vice chair Dan Esko said. 
 
The board will discuss these projects at a future meeting. 

Tags: electric vehicle,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Superintendant Warns of Prohibited Toy Guns

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The district has been alerted of a concerning trend that is prohibited on school grounds: Orby or Orbeez gel guns.

The toy guns shoot gel or water beads and are said to pose a risk of physical harm and being mistaken for a real firearm. They are a violation of the Pittsfield Public School's code of conduct and could result in a suspension of 11 days or more.

"Though these may appear as simple toys, it's crucial to recognize the potential risks tied to their usage. By raising awareness, we aim to educate our community about the possible hazards associated with these items, emphasizing the importance of informed decision-making and responsible behavior," said Superintendent Joseph Curtis in a memo to the Pittsfield Public School community on Friday.

Last fall, someone used a similar gun to target cross-country students and a coach from Lee High. No one was injured in the incident. 

Given the frequency of school shootings nationwide, Curtis said schools cannot afford to accommodate anything that even remotely that resembles a firearm. The toy guns and gel beads are secured behind a locked case in Walmart on Hubbard Avenue, many indicating that they are for ages 14 and older.

"The Pittsfield Public Schools firmly maintains that Orby toy guns and any associated pellets should not be brought onto school premises, including both indoor and outdoor areas. This directive is in place to ensure the safety and well-being of all students, staff, and visitors within our educational environment," he wrote.

"We stress the significance of following this directive to prevent any potential hazards or disruptions that may arise from the presence of these items on school grounds. By upholding this standard, we aim to cultivate a secure and conducive learning environment for everyone within the Pittsfield community."

The superintendent listed three potential hazards of the water-bead guns in the schools:

  • Physical Injuries: The guns have the capacity to propel projectiles at considerable speeds, posing a risk of injury to the eyes, skin, and even teeth, particularly when fired in close proximity.
     
  • Misidentification Risks: Due to their realistic appearance, some Orby guns may be mistaken for genuine firearms. Such misidentification could result in confusion and potentially perilous encounters, especially if law enforcement or bystanders perceive them as real weapons.
     
  • Public Disruption: The act of firing Orby guns in public settings can be highly disruptive and alarming to others. Such behavior may instill fear and panic among individuals nearby, potentially leading to charges of disorderly conduct or harassment.
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories